Opinion
22-6398
07-29-2022
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. ADAM LAWRENCE RANDOLPH, IV, Defendant-Appellant.
Adam Lawrence Randolph, IV, Appellant Pro Se.
UNPUBLISHED
Submitted: July 26, 2022
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Max O. Cogburn, Jr., District Judge. (3:18-cr-00340-MOC-DSC-1)
Adam Lawrence Randolph, IV, Appellant Pro Se.
Before MOTZ, KING, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Adam Lawrence Randolph, IV, appeals the district court's order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A) motion for compassionate release. After reviewing the record, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Randolph's motion. See United States v. High, 997 F.3d 181, 185 (4th Cir. 2021) (stating standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Randolph, No. 3:18-cr-00340-MOC-DSC-1 (W.D. N.C. Mar. 17, 2022). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED