From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Randolph

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
Sep 16, 2014
579 F. App'x 942 (11th Cir. 2014)

Opinion

No. 14-10941

09-16-2014

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. JAQUES D. RANDOLPH, Defendant-Appellant.


[DO NOT PUBLISH] Non-Argument Calendar D.C. Docket No. 8:12-cr-00565-RAL-EAJ-1 Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida Before WILLIAM PRYOR, MARTIN, and ROSENBAUM, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

Thomas A. Burns, appointed counsel for Jaques Randolph in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel's assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Randolph's conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

United States v. Randolph

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
Sep 16, 2014
579 F. App'x 942 (11th Cir. 2014)
Case details for

United States v. Randolph

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. JAQUES D. RANDOLPH…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Sep 16, 2014

Citations

579 F. App'x 942 (11th Cir. 2014)