From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Ramirez-Ramirez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 19, 2011
2:11-CR-00102 LKK (E.D. Cal. Sep. 19, 2011)

Opinion

2:11-CR-00102 LKK

09-19-2011

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. HERNAN RAMIREZ-RAMIREZ, et al., Defendants.

DANIEL J. BRODERICK, Bar# 89424 Federal Defender MATTHEW M. SCOBLE, Bar# 237432 Assistant Federal Defender Attorney for Defendant HERNAN RAMIREZ-RAMIREZ BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney MICHAEL ANDERSON Assistant U.S. Attorney Attorney for Plaintiff


DANIEL J. BRODERICK, Bar# 89424

Federal Defender

MATTHEW M. SCOBLE, Bar# 237432

Assistant Federal Defender

Attorney for Defendant

HERNAN RAMIREZ-RAMIREZ

STIPULATION AND ORDER

DATE: October 18, 2011

TIME: 9:15 a.m.

JUDGE: Hon. Lawrence K. Karlton

It is hereby stipulated and agreed to between the United States of America through MICHAEL ANDERSON, Assistant U.S. Attorney, and defendant, HERNAN RAMIREZ-RAMIREZ, by and through his counsel, MATTHEW M. SCOBLE, Assistant Federal Defender, DANIEL VARGAS SALINAS, by and through his counsel, GILBERT ROQUE, that the status conference set for Tuesday, September 20, 2011, be continued to Tuesday, October 18, 2011, at 9:15 a.m.

The reason for this continuance is to allow defense counsel additional time to review discovery with the defendants, to examine possible defenses and to continue investigating the facts of the case.

It is further stipulated that the time period from the date of this stipulation, through and including the date of the new status conference hearing, October 18, 2011, shall be excluded from computation of time within which the trial of this matter must be commenced under the Speedy Trial Act, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161 (h)(7)(A) & (B)(iv)and Local Code T4 [reasonable time for defense counsel to prepare].

Respectfully submitted,

DANIEL J. BRODERICK

Federal Defender

MATTHEW M. SCOBLE

Assistant Federal Defender

Attorney for Defendant

HERNAN RAMIREZ-RAMIREZ

Matthew M. Scoble for

GILBERT ROQUE, Esq.

Attorney for Defendant

DANIEL VARGAS SALINAS

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

MICHAEL ANDERSON

Assistant U.S. Attorney

Attorney for Plaintiff

ORDER

Based on the stipulation of the parties and good cause appearing therefrom, the Court hereby adopts the stipulation of the parties in its entirety as its order. It is hereby ordered that the presently set September 20, 2011, status conference shall be continued to October 18, 2011, at 9:15 a.m. It is further ordered that the time period from the date of the parties' stipulation, September 15, 2011, through and including the date of the new status conference hearing, October 18, 2011, shall be excluded from computation of time within which the trial of this matter must be commenced under the Speedy Trial Act, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161 (h)(7)(A) & (B)(iv) and Local Code T4 [reasonable time for defense counsel to prepare].

Based on the stipulation of the parties and good cause appearing therefrom, the Court hereby finds that the failure to grant a continuance in this case would deny defense counsel reasonable time for effective preparation taking into account the exercise of due diligence. The Court specifically finds that the ends of justice served by the granting of such continuance outweigh the interests of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

LAWRENCE K. KARLTON

SENIOR JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


Summaries of

United States v. Ramirez-Ramirez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 19, 2011
2:11-CR-00102 LKK (E.D. Cal. Sep. 19, 2011)
Case details for

United States v. Ramirez-Ramirez

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. HERNAN RAMIREZ-RAMIREZ, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Sep 19, 2011

Citations

2:11-CR-00102 LKK (E.D. Cal. Sep. 19, 2011)