From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Ramirez-Macias

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Sep 14, 2006
201 F. App'x 538 (9th Cir. 2006)

Opinion

Submitted September 11, 2001.

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION. (See Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure Rule 36-3)

Donald E. Kresse, Jr., Esq., USYA--Office of the U.S. Attorney, Yakima, WA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Tracy Staab, FPDWA--Federal Public Defender's Office, Spokane, WA, for Defendant-Appellant.


Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington, Edward F. Shea, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CR-05-02108-EFS.

Before: PREGERSON, T.G. NELSON, and GRABER, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Rafael Ramirez-Macias appeals his 51-month sentence imposed following his guilty plea to being found in the United States after illegal re-entry, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S. C.§ 1291, and we affirm.

Ramirez-Macias contends that the district court violated his constitutional rights by imposing a sentence in excess of the two-year maximum set forth in 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) based on a prior conviction that was neither proved to a jury nor admitted during the plea colloquy. This contention is foreclosed by United States v. Beng-Salazar, 452 F.3d 1088, 1091 (9th Cir.2006). Moreover, at the plea colloquy, Ramirez-Macias admitted that he had been deported on December 18, 1996, which was subsequent to his July 25, 1989 drug conviction.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

United States v. Ramirez-Macias

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Sep 14, 2006
201 F. App'x 538 (9th Cir. 2006)
Case details for

United States v. Ramirez-Macias

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff--Appellee, v. Rafael RAMIREZ-MACIAS…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Sep 14, 2006

Citations

201 F. App'x 538 (9th Cir. 2006)