From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Ramirez-Espinoza

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 20, 2011
NO. 1:10-cr-0217 OWW (E.D. Cal. Sep. 20, 2011)

Opinion

NO. 1:10-cr-0217 OWW

09-20-2011

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. CARLOS DANIEL RAMIREZ-ESPINOZA, Defendant.

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney YASHAR NILCHIAN Special Assistant United States Attorney Attorney for Plaintiff DANIEL J. BRODERICK Federal Defender PEGGY SASSO Assistant Federal Defender Attorney for Defendant CARLOS DANIEL RAMIREZ-ESPINOZA


DANIEL J. BRODERICK, #89424

Federal Defender

PEGGY SASSO, CA Bar #228906

Assistant Federal Defender

Attorney for Defendant

CARLOS DANIEL RAMIREZ-ESPINOZA

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE; ORDER

Date: December 19, 2011

Time: 1:30 p.m.

Judge: TBD

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties through their respective counsel, Assistant United States Attorney Yashar Nilchian, Counsel for Plaintiff, and Assistant Federal Defender Peggy Sasso, Counsel for Defendant Carlos Daniel Ramirez-Espinoza, that the hearing currently set for September 26, 2011 at 9:00 a.m., may be rescheduled to December 19, 2011 at 1:30 p.m. and the schedule for filing of motions and for hearing thereon may be set as follows: Opening brief by November 14, 2011; Opposition brief by December 7, 2011; Reply by December 14, 2011. The revised hearing date is requested given that the Superior Court of California, County of San Joaquin moved the hearing on Mr. Ramirez-Espinoza's motion to vacate judgment in Case No. SF105250C from September 14, 2011 to October 12, 2011. It is anticipated that the Superior Court will issue its ruling on or shortly after the hearing.

The parties agree that the delay resulting from the continuance shall be excluded because the ends of justice served by continuing this case outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial in that additional time is necessary for effective defense preparation. 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161(h)(7)(A) and 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv).

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

YASHAR NILCHIAN

Special Assistant United States Attorney

Attorney for Plaintiff

DANIEL J. BRODERICK

Federal Defender

PEGGY SASSO

Assistant Federal Defender

Attorney for Defendant

CARLOS DANIEL RAMIREZ-ESPINOZA

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Oliver W. Wanger

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Ramirez-Espinoza

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 20, 2011
NO. 1:10-cr-0217 OWW (E.D. Cal. Sep. 20, 2011)
Case details for

United States v. Ramirez-Espinoza

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. CARLOS DANIEL RAMIREZ-ESPINOZA…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Sep 20, 2011

Citations

NO. 1:10-cr-0217 OWW (E.D. Cal. Sep. 20, 2011)