From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Ramirez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 17, 2016
CASE NO. 2:16-MJ-00003 (E.D. Cal. Mar. 17, 2016)

Opinion

CASE NO. 2:16-MJ-00003

03-17-2016

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. IVAN LOUIS SEBASTIAN RAMIREZ, Defendant.

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney JEREMY J. KELLEY Assistant United States Attorney 501 I Street, Suite 10-100 Sacramento, CA 95814 Telephone: (916) 554-2700 Facsimile: (916) 554-2900 Attorneys for Plaintiff United States of America


BENJAMIN B. WAGNER
United States Attorney
JEREMY J. KELLEY
Assistant United States Attorney
501 I Street, Suite 10-100
Sacramento, CA 95814
Telephone: (916) 554-2700
Facsimile: (916) 554-2900 Attorneys for Plaintiff
United States of America FINDINGS AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING PURSUANT TO RULE 5.1(d) AND EXCLUDING TIME DATE: March 25, 2016
TIME: 2:00 p.m.
COURT: Hon. Kendall J. Newman

The Court has read and considered the Stipulation for Extension of Time for Preliminary Hearing Pursuant to Rule 5.1(d) and Exclusion of Time, filed by the parties in this matter on March 17, 2016. The Court hereby finds that the Stipulation and parties' representations, which this Court incorporates by reference into this Order, demonstrate good cause for an extension of time for the preliminary hearing date pursuant to Rule 5.1(d) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure.

Furthermore, for the reasons set forth by the parties, the Court finds that the interests of justice served by granting this continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A). The Court further finds that the extension of time would not adversely affect the public interest in the prompt disposition of criminal cases. /// /// THEREFORE, FOR GOOD CAUSE SHOWN:

1. The date of the preliminary hearing is extended to May 6, 2016, at 2:00 p.m.

2. The time between March 25, 2016, and May 6, 2016, shall be excluded from calculation pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A).

3. Defendant shall appear at that date and time before the Magistrate Judge on duty.

IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: March 17, 2016

/s/_________

KENDALL J. NEWMAN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Ramirez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 17, 2016
CASE NO. 2:16-MJ-00003 (E.D. Cal. Mar. 17, 2016)
Case details for

United States v. Ramirez

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. IVAN LOUIS SEBASTIAN RAMIREZ…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Mar 17, 2016

Citations

CASE NO. 2:16-MJ-00003 (E.D. Cal. Mar. 17, 2016)