From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Ramirez

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Oct 20, 2022
CR 19-0002 JAM (E.D. Cal. Oct. 20, 2022)

Opinion

CR 19-0002 JAM

10-20-2022

UNITED STATES, Plaintiff, v. SALVADOR JESUS RAMIREZ, and SUSAN DANE COSTORIO CASILLAS, Defendants.

Michael E. Hansen Attorney for Defendant Susan Dane Costorio Casillas NOLAN BARTON & OLMOS, LLP Daniel B. Olmos Attorney for Defendant Salvador Jesus Ramirez PHILLIP A. TALBERT United States Attorney Heiko Coppola Assistant United States Attorney


Michael E. Hansen Attorney for Defendant Susan Dane Costorio Casillas

NOLAN BARTON & OLMOS, LLP Daniel B. Olmos Attorney for Defendant Salvador Jesus Ramirez

PHILLIP A. TALBERT United States Attorney Heiko Coppola Assistant United States Attorney

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE STATUS HEARING

THE HONORABLE JOHN A. MENDEZ SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED between the Government, through Assistant United States Attorney Heiko Coppola, and Defendants Salvador Jesus Ramirez and Susan Dane Costorio Casillas, through their undersigned counsel, that the status hearing in this matter be continued from October 25, 2022, to January 10, 2023, to permit defense counsel to continue reviewing discovery and preparing their defense. Further, defense counsel for both defendants have provided additional discovery to the government which the government needs time to review and consider.

The parties further agree and request that the Court order, for the purpose of computing time under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161, et seq., within which the trial of this case must commence, that the time period between October 25, 2022, to and including the January 10, 2023, status hearing, be excluded pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and B(iv) and Local Code T4 to allow defense counsel reasonable time to prepare their clients' defense. The parties also stipulate that the ends of justice served by granting this continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

For the foregoing reasons, the parties stipulate to continue the status conference to January 10, 2023, at 9:30 a.m.

IT IS SO STIPULATED:

ORDER TO CONTINUE STATUS HEARING

GOOD CAUSE HAVING BEEN SHOWN, and pursuant to stipulation by the parties, it is hereby ordered that the status hearing for Defendants Salvador Jesus Ramirez and Susan Dane Costorio Casillas be continued to January 10, 2023, at 9:00 a.m. It is further ordered that, for the purpose of computing time under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161, et seq., the time period between October 25, 2022, to and including the January 10, 2023, status hearing be excluded pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and B(iv) and Local Code T4. The Court finds that the ends of justice served by granting this continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.


Summaries of

United States v. Ramirez

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Oct 20, 2022
CR 19-0002 JAM (E.D. Cal. Oct. 20, 2022)
Case details for

United States v. Ramirez

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES, Plaintiff, v. SALVADOR JESUS RAMIREZ, and SUSAN DANE…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Oct 20, 2022

Citations

CR 19-0002 JAM (E.D. Cal. Oct. 20, 2022)