From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Ramirez

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 30, 2021
2:18-CR-00080-JAM (E.D. Cal. Jun. 30, 2021)

Opinion

2:18-CR-00080-JAM

06-30-2021

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JONATHAN LOPEZ CASTANEDA, Defendant.

PHILLIP A. TALBERT, JUSTIN L. LEE, CLEMENTE JIMENEZ, Counsel for Defendant Jonathan Castaneda.


Dated August 17, 2021.

PHILLIP A. TALBERT, JUSTIN L. LEE, CLEMENTE JIMENEZ, Counsel for Defendant Jonathan Castaneda.

REQUEST TO REOPEN FORMAL OBJECTIONS TO PSR

THE HONORABLE JOHN A. MENDEZ, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE.

By previous order, this matter was set for judgment and sentencing on August 17, 2021. In preparation for sentencing, the parties developed new information that impacts the Court's calculation of the sentencing guidelines. Accordingly, the parties jointly request that the Court reopen the briefing schedule for formal objections to allow the defendant to file a formal objection to the PSR. The United States anticipates filing a non-opposition to the formal objection. The parties anticipate that judgment and sentencing will be able to go forward on the previously-scheduled date of August 17.

ORDER

Based on the request of the parties, the previously-ordered briefing schedule is modified as follows:

1. Formal objections to the PSR shall be filed by July 20, 2021;

2. Any response or opposition shall be filed by July 27, 2021;

3. Judgment and Sentencing shall proceed on August 17, 2021, at 9:30 a.m.

IT IS ORDERED.


Summaries of

United States v. Ramirez

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 30, 2021
2:18-CR-00080-JAM (E.D. Cal. Jun. 30, 2021)
Case details for

United States v. Ramirez

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JONATHAN LOPEZ CASTANEDA…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jun 30, 2021

Citations

2:18-CR-00080-JAM (E.D. Cal. Jun. 30, 2021)