From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Ramirez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 19, 2012
CR.S. 10-186-JAM (E.D. Cal. Jan. 19, 2012)

Opinion

CR.S. 10-186-JAM

01-19-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. RAY RAMIREZ, Defendant.

DANIEL J. BRODERICK, #89424 Federal Defender DENNIS S. WAKS, BAR #142581 Supervising Assistant Federal Defender Attorney for Defendant RAY RAMIREZ


DANIEL J. BRODERICK, #89424

Federal Defender

DENNIS S. WAKS, BAR #142581

Supervising Assistant Federal Defender

Attorney for Defendant

RAY RAMIREZ

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR STATUS CONFERENCE AND EXCLUDE TIME


DATE: March 6, 2012

Judge: John A. Mendez

Defendant RAY RAMIREZ, by and through his counsel, DENNIS S. WAKS, Supervising Assistant Federal Defender, and the United States Government, by and through its counsel, JILL M. THOMAS, Assistant United States Attorney, hereby stipulate that the status conference set for January 24, 2011, be rescheduled for a status conference on Tuesday, March 6, 2012, at 1:30 p.m..

This continuance is being requested because defense counsel requires additional time to receive and review discovery, discuss the case with the government, and pursue investigation. Furthermore, this defendant has some serious medical conditions which effect his ability to assist counsel at the present time.

Speedy trial time is to be excluded from the date of this order through the date of the status conference set for March 6, 2012, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §3161(h)(7)(B)(iv) and Local Code T4. [reasonable time to prepare].

Respectfully Submitted,

DANIEL J. BRODERICK

Federal Defender

___________________________

Supervising Assistant

Federal Defender

Attorney for Defendant

RAY RAMIREZ

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

___________________________

JILL M. THOMAS

Assistant U.S. Attorney

ORDER

Based on the stipulation of the parties and good cause appearing therefrom, the Court hereby finds that the failure to grant a continuance in this case would deny defense counsel reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. The Court specifically finds that the ends of justice served by the granting of such continuance outweigh the interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. Based on these findings and pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, the Court hereby adopts the stipulation of the parties in its entirety as its order. Time is excluded from computation of time within which the trial of this matter must be commenced beginning from the date of the stipulation, January 24, 2012, through and including March 6, 2012, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv) [reasonable time for defense counsel to prepare] and Local Code T4. A new status conference date is hereby set for March 6, 2012, at 1:30 p.m..

___________________________

JOHN A. MENDEZ

United States District Judge.


Summaries of

United States v. Ramirez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 19, 2012
CR.S. 10-186-JAM (E.D. Cal. Jan. 19, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Ramirez

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. RAY RAMIREZ, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 19, 2012

Citations

CR.S. 10-186-JAM (E.D. Cal. Jan. 19, 2012)