From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Radcliff

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Dec 17, 2013
Civil Action No. 13-cv-03331-PAB (D. Colo. Dec. 17, 2013)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 13-cv-03331-PAB Criminal Case No. 99-cr-00061-PAB-2

12-17-2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. 2. JOHN WESLEY RADCLIFF, Defendant.


FINAL JUDGMENT

Pursuant to and in accordance with the Order Denying 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion entered by the Honorable Philip A. Brimmer, U.S. District Judge, on December 17, 2013 (Docket No. 1436), the following Final Judgment is hereby entered:

It is ORDERED as follows:

1. That the 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion, filed December 10, 2013 (#1435), is DENIED;
2. That the corresponding civil action is dismissed;
3. That under 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) and Rule 11 of the Rules Governing Section 2255 Proceedings for the United States District Courts, a certificate of appealability is DENIED; and
4. That leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal is DENIED without prejudice to the filing of a motion seeking leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal in the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit.

Dated at Denver, Colorado this 17th day of December, 2013.

FOR THE COURT:

JEFFREY P. COLWELL, CLERK

By: Edward P. Butler

Edward P. Butler, Deputy Clerk


Summaries of

United States v. Radcliff

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Dec 17, 2013
Civil Action No. 13-cv-03331-PAB (D. Colo. Dec. 17, 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Radcliff

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. 2. JOHN WESLEY RADCLIFF, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Dec 17, 2013

Citations

Civil Action No. 13-cv-03331-PAB (D. Colo. Dec. 17, 2013)