From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Quiroz-Jones

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 26, 2011
CASE NO. 2:09 MJ 250 DAD (E.D. Cal. Sep. 26, 2011)

Opinion

CASE NO. 2:09 MJ 250 DAD

09-26-2011

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. Sanae Quiroz-Jones, Defendant.

JOHN R. MANNING Attorney for Defendant Sanae Quiroz-Jones Benjamin B. Wagner United States Attorney TODD D. LERAS Assistant U.S. Attorney


John R. Manning

Attorney at Law

Attorney for Defendant

Sanae Quiroz-Jones

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER

CONTINUING PRELIMINARY HEARING

The parties to this action, defendant, Sanae Quiroz-Jones and plaintiff, United States of America, hereby stipulate through their respective attorneys to continue the preliminary hearing scheduled for September 23, 2011, to October 12, 2011, at 2:00 p.m.

The parties are working toward reaching a pre-indictment resolution of the pending charges. The government has provided a Plea Agreement to defense counsel. Ms. Jones lives out of the area and suffers from significant health problems (liver disease, diabetes, fibromyalgia, and a myriad of other medical problems). Ms. Jones is unable to drive and must rely on others for transportation.

Defense counsel has attempted to discuss the settlement proposal with Ms. Jones over the phone. However, given Ms. Jones significant health issues and the effect of the medically necessary prescription medication Ms. Jones must take, counsel for the Defense believes a phone conference is an inadequate and ineffective means of communicating with the Defendant. Counsel for the Defense needs additional time to arrange for a face to face meeting with Ms. Jones in order to effectively communicate the terms of the proposed settlement, its' consequences and to answer Ms. Jones' questions and advise her on how to proceed.

The parties further agree that the above reason constitutes good cause to extend the time for preliminary hearing under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 5.1, and that the time within which the indictment must be filed should be extended to October 12, 2011, pursuant to the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv), for the reasons stated above.

Respectfully submitted,

JOHN R. MANNING

Attorney for Defendant

Sanae Quiroz-Jones

Benjamin B. Wagner

United States Attorney

TODD D. LERAS

Assistant U.S. Attorney

John R. Manning

Attorney at Law

Attorney for Defendant

Sanae Quiroz-Jones

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff,

v.

Sanae Quiroz-Jones, Defendant.

Case No. 2:09 MJ 250 DAD

ORDER TO CONTINUE PRELIMINARY HEARING

GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, it is hereby ordered that the September 23, 2011 preliminary hearing for defendant Quiroz-Jones, be continued to October 12, 2011 at 2:00 p.m. I find that the ends of justice warrant an exclusion of time pursuant to the reason stated in the stipulation of the parties. THEREFORE IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that time be excluded pursuant to Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv) from the date of this order to October 12, 2011.

No further extensions are authorized.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Gregory G. Hollows

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Quiroz-Jones

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 26, 2011
CASE NO. 2:09 MJ 250 DAD (E.D. Cal. Sep. 26, 2011)
Case details for

United States v. Quiroz-Jones

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. Sanae Quiroz-Jones, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Sep 26, 2011

Citations

CASE NO. 2:09 MJ 250 DAD (E.D. Cal. Sep. 26, 2011)