From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Quintero-Rodriguez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 31, 2011
No. 1:11-CR-00197-LJO (E.D. Cal. Aug. 31, 2011)

Opinion

No. 1:11-CR-00197-LJO

08-31-2011

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. OMAR QUINTERO-RODRIGUEZ ET AL., Defendants.


ROBERT L. FORKNER (CSB# 106697)

Law Offices of Robert L. Forkner

Attorney for Defendant

OMAR QUINTERO-RODRIGUEZ

ORDER TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE

(note lines 1-3)

GOOD CAUSE APPEARING in paragraph 3 of the stipulation (in that paragraph 2 simply says that counsel are not ready—hardly good cause), it is hereby ordered that the September 2, 2011 Status Conference be continued to September 23, 2011 at 9:00 a.m. I find that the ends of justice warrant an exclusion of time and that the defendant's need for continuity of counsel and reasonable time for effective preparation exceeds the public interest in a trial within 70 days. THEREFORE IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that time be excluded pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161 (h) (7) (B) (iv) from the date of this order to September 23, 2011.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Lawrence J. O'Neill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Quintero-Rodriguez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 31, 2011
No. 1:11-CR-00197-LJO (E.D. Cal. Aug. 31, 2011)
Case details for

United States v. Quintero-Rodriguez

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. OMAR QUINTERO-RODRIGUEZ ET AL.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Aug 31, 2011

Citations

No. 1:11-CR-00197-LJO (E.D. Cal. Aug. 31, 2011)