From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Quesnel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 2, 2011
Case No.: 1:08-cr-00413 AWI (E.D. Cal. Aug. 2, 2011)

Opinion

Case No.: 1:08-cr-00413 AWI

08-02-2011

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JASON QUESNEL, Defendant.

Respectfully submitted, SCHWEITZER & DAVIDIAN, APC. By: ERIC H. SCHWEITZER Attorney for Defendant, JASON QUESNEL LAW OFFICE OF RICHARD P. BERMAN By: RICHARD P. BERMAN Attorney for Defendant, JASON QUESNEL UNITED STATES ATTORNEY By: BRIAN W. ENOS Assistant U.S. Attorney


ERIC H. SCHWEITZER #179776

SCHWEITZER & DAVIDIAN

A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION

ATTORNEY FOR: JASON QUESNEL

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO

CONTINUE SEPTEMBER 6, 2011,

EVIDENTIARY HEARING

TO THE HONORABLE ANTHONY W. ISHII, CHIEF DISTRICT COURT JUDGE OF THE ABOVE-ENTITLED COURT:

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

At the Hearing of Mr. Quesnel's Henthorn Motion, it was decided that an evidentiary hearing on the underlying Fifth Amendment issues in the related matter would be resumed on September 6, 2011 at the hour of 1:30 p.m..

At a meeting in the ante chamber, immediately after the hearing on August 1, 2011, it was learned that witnesses for the evidentiary hearing would in fact be unavailable on September 6, 2011. This writer then called Mr. Enos to let him know of this circumstance. Mr. Enos then indicated that he would not have any problem with a later hearing date.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto, by and through their representative attorneys of record, that the hearing regarding Defendant's motion presently scheduled for hearing on September 6, 2011, at 1:30 p.m., in Department 2, be continued to Tuesday, October 11, 2011, at 1:30 p.m., in Department 2.

This stipulation is based on good cause because the witnesses that this writer had intended to present on September 6, 2011, will be unavailable on that date.

The Government is available to proceed with the hearing on October 11, 2011, at 1:30 p.m..

The delay resulting from this continuance shall be excluded in the interests of justice under 18 U.S.C. §3161(h)(7)(A) and §3161(h)(7)(B)(ii).

Respectfully submitted,

SCHWEITZER & DAVIDIAN, APC.

By: ERIC H. SCHWEITZER

Attorney for Defendant,

JASON QUESNEL

LAW OFFICE OF RICHARD P. BERMAN

By: RICHARD P. BERMAN

Attorney for Defendant,

JASON QUESNEL

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

By: BRIAN W. ENOS

Assistant U.S. Attorney

ORDER

Good cause appearing therefor,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion Hearing currently set for September 6, 2011, at 1:30 p.m., in Department 2, be vacated and be calendared for October 11, 2011, at 1:30 p.m., in Department 2. IT IS SO ORDERED.

____________

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Quesnel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 2, 2011
Case No.: 1:08-cr-00413 AWI (E.D. Cal. Aug. 2, 2011)
Case details for

United States v. Quesnel

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JASON QUESNEL, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Aug 2, 2011

Citations

Case No.: 1:08-cr-00413 AWI (E.D. Cal. Aug. 2, 2011)