From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Purkey

United States District Court, District of Montana
Aug 7, 2024
CR 24-15-BLG-SPW (D. Mont. Aug. 7, 2024)

Opinion

CR 24-15-BLG-SPW

08-07-2024

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. KENNETH WILLIAM PURKEY, Defendant.


ORDER

Susan P. Watters, Judge

On June 5, 2024, the Court granted the United States' Motion to Hold in Abeyance Defendant Kenneth William Purkey's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 46) until a mandate is filed by the Ninth Circuit in United States v. Duarte, 101 F.4th657(9th Cir. 2024). (Doc. 48).

Purkey filed his motion to dismiss (Doc. 44) after the three-judge panel of the Ninth Circuit in Duarte found 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1), which prohibits convicted felons from possessing firearms, was unconstitutional as applied to Duarte, a nonviolent felon. 101 F.4th at 691.

After Purkey filed his motion, the Ninth Circuit granted rehearing en banc in Duarte. 101 F.4th 657, reh'g en banc granted, opinion vacated, F.4th, 2024 WL 3443151 (9th Cir. Jul. 17,2024). The order granting rehearing en banc vacated the panel decision. Duarte, 2024 WL 3443151, at * 1 (citing Fed. R. App. P. 35(a); 9th Cir. R. 35-3). As such, the panel's holding is void and no longer has legal effect. No mandate will be filed, and abeyance is no longer warranted.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the abeyance be lifted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Government shall file a response brief within 14 days of this Order. Purkey's reply is due within 7 days of the Government's response.


Summaries of

United States v. Purkey

United States District Court, District of Montana
Aug 7, 2024
CR 24-15-BLG-SPW (D. Mont. Aug. 7, 2024)
Case details for

United States v. Purkey

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. KENNETH WILLIAM PURKEY, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, District of Montana

Date published: Aug 7, 2024

Citations

CR 24-15-BLG-SPW (D. Mont. Aug. 7, 2024)