From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Pulido

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 7, 2011
No. Cr.S. 11-126-JAM (E.D. Cal. Oct. 7, 2011)

Opinion

No. Cr.S. 11-126-JAM

10-07-2011

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JOSE CUEVAS PULIDO, Defendant.

DANIEL J. BRODERICK Federal Defender MATTHEW M. SCOBLE Assistant Federal Defender Attorney for JOSE CUEVAS PULIDO BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney Matthew M. Scoble for MICHELE BECKWITH Assistant U.S. Attorney


DANIEL J. BRODERICK, Bar #89424

Federal Defender

MATTHEW M. SCOBLE, Bar# 237432

Assistant Federal Defender

Attorney for Defendant

JOSE CUEVAS PULIDO

STIPULATION AND ORDER

CONTINUING STATUS CONFERENCE

AND EXCLUDING TIME

Judge: Hon. John A. Mendez

It is hereby stipulated and agreed to between the United States of America through MICHELE BECKWITH Assistant U.S. Attorney, and defendant, JOSE CUEVAS PULIDO, by and through his counsel, MATTHEW M. SCOBLE, Assistant Federal Defender, that the status conference set for Tuesday, October 11, 2011, be continued to Tuesday, November 8, 2011, at 9:30 a.m.

The reason for this continuance is to allow defense counsel additional time to discuss plea negotiations with the government and the defendant.

The parties agree that the ends of justice to be served by a continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial, and they ask the Court to exclude time under the Speedy Trial Act from the date of this order through November 8, 2011, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv)(Local Code T4).

Respectfully submitted,

DANIEL J. BRODERICK

Federal Defender

MATTHEW M. SCOBLE

Assistant Federal Defender

Attorney for JOSE CUEVAS PULIDO

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

Matthew M. Scoble for

MICHELE BECKWITH

Assistant U.S. Attorney

ORDER

The status conference is continued to November 8, 2011, at 9:30 a.m. For the reasons set forth above, the court finds that the ends of justice to be served by a continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial and therefore excludes time under the Speedy Trial Act through November 8, 2011.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

HON. JOHN A. MENDEZ

United States District Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Pulido

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 7, 2011
No. Cr.S. 11-126-JAM (E.D. Cal. Oct. 7, 2011)
Case details for

United States v. Pulido

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JOSE CUEVAS PULIDO, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 7, 2011

Citations

No. Cr.S. 11-126-JAM (E.D. Cal. Oct. 7, 2011)