From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Pride

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 17, 2012
Cr.S. 11-170-LKK (E.D. Cal. Jan. 17, 2012)

Opinion

Cr.S. 11-170-LKK

01-17-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. MARCUS DESHAUN PRIDE, Defendants.

DANIEL J. BRODERICK, Bar# 89424 Federal Defender BENJAMIN D. GALLOWAY, Bar# 214897 Assistant Federal Defender Attorney for Defendant MARCUS DESHAUN PRIDE


DANIEL J. BRODERICK, Bar# 89424

Federal Defender

BENJAMIN D. GALLOWAY, Bar# 214897

Assistant Federal Defender

Attorney for Defendant

MARCUS DESHAUN PRIDE

STIPULATION AND ORDER

DATE: February 14, 2012

TIME: 9:15 a.m.

JUDGE: Hon. Lawrence K. Karlton

This case is currently scheduled for a status conference on January 18, 2012. The parties have conferred and agree that additional time is needed for negotiation with the hope of resolving the case. In addition, the parties are awaiting the completion of a previously ordered pre-plea advisory guideline presentence investigation report that will aid the parties toward resolving the case.

It is hereby stipulated and agreed to between the United States of America through JASON HITT, Assistant U.S. Attorney, and defendant, MARCUS DESHAUN PRIDE by and through his counsel, BENJAMIN GALLOWAY, Assistant Federal Defender, that the status conference set for Wednesday, January 18, 2012, be continued to Tuesday, February 14, 2012, at 9:15 a.m..

It is further stipulated that the time period from the date of this stipulation, January 11, 2012, through and including the date of the new status conference hearing, February 14, 2012, shall be excluded from computation of time within which the trial of this matter must be commenced under the Speedy Trial Act, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161 (h)(7)(B)(iv)and Local Code T4 [reasonable time for defense counsel to prepare].

Respectfully submitted,

DANIEL J. BRODERICK

Federal Defender

_____________________

BENJAMIN GALLOWAY

Assistant Federal Defender

Attorney for Defendant

MARCUS DESHAUN PRIDE

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

_____________________

JASON HITT

Assistant U.S. Attorney

Attorney for Plaintiff

ORDER

Based on the stipulation of the parties and good cause appearing therefrom, the Court hereby adopts the stipulation of the parties in its entirety as its order. It is hereby ordered that the presently set January 18, 2012, status conference shall be continued to February 14, 2012, at 9:15 a.m.. It is further ordered that the time period from the date of the parties' stipulation, January 11, 2012, through and including the date of the new status conference hearing, February 14, 2012, shall be excluded from computation of time within which the trial of this matter must be commenced under the Speedy Trial Act, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161 (h)(7)(B)(iv) and Local Code T4 [reasonable time for defense counsel to prepare].

Based on the stipulation of the parties and good cause appearing therefrom, the Court hereby finds that the failure to grant a continuance in this case would deny defense counsel reasonable time for effective preparation taking into account the exercise of due diligence. The Court specifically finds that the ends of justice served by the granting of such continuance outweigh the interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

_____________________

LAWRENCE K. KARLTON

SENIOR JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


Summaries of

United States v. Pride

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 17, 2012
Cr.S. 11-170-LKK (E.D. Cal. Jan. 17, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Pride

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. MARCUS DESHAUN PRIDE, Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 17, 2012

Citations

Cr.S. 11-170-LKK (E.D. Cal. Jan. 17, 2012)