From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Pride

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 7, 2011
Cr.S. 11-170-LKK (E.D. Cal. Oct. 7, 2011)

Opinion

Cr.S. 11-170-LKK

10-07-2011

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. MARCUS DESHAUN PRIDE, Defendants.

Respectfully submitted, DANIEL J. BRODERICK Federal Defender BENJAMIN GALLOWAY Assistant Federal Defender Attorney for Defendant MARCUS DESHAUN PRIDE BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney Benjamin Galloway for JASON HITT Assistant U.S. Attorney Attorney for Plaintiff


DANIEL J. BRODERICK, Bar# 89424

Federal Defender

BENJAMIN D. GALLOWAY, Bar# 214897

Assistant Federal Defender

Attorney for Defendant

MARCUS DESHAUN PRIDE

STIPULATION AND ORDER


JUDGE: Hon. Lawrence K. Karlton

This case is currently scheduled for a status conference on October 18, 2011. The parties have conferred and agree that additional time is needed for negotiation between the parties with the hope of resolving the case. Specifically, the parties have agreed that a pre-plea advisory guideline presentence investigation report would aid the parties toward resolving the case and respectfully request that this Court order the Probation Office to produce a pre-plea advisory guideline presentence investigation report in Mr. Pride's case.

It is hereby stipulated and agreed to between the United States of America through JASON HITT, Assistant U.S. Attorney, and defendant, MARCUS DESHAUN PRIDE by and through his counsel, BENJAMIN GALLOWAY, Assistant Federal Defender, that the status conference set for Tuesday, October 18, 2011, be continued to Tuesday, December 6, 2011, at 9:15 a.m..

The reason for this continuance is to allow defense counsel additional time to review discovery with the defendant, to examine possible defenses and to continue investigating the facts of the case. The parties agree that a pre-plea advisory guideline presentence investigation report from the probation office will aid counsel in resolving the case.

It is further stipulated that the time period from the date of this stipulation, October 3, 2011, through and including the date of the new status conference hearing, December 6, 2011, shall be excluded from computation of time within which the trial of this matter must be commenced under the Speedy Trial Act, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161 (h)(7)(B)(iv)and Local Code T4 [reasonable time for defense counsel to prepare].

Respectfully submitted,

DANIEL J. BRODERICK

Federal Defender

BENJAMIN GALLOWAY

Assistant Federal Defender

Attorney for Defendant

MARCUS DESHAUN PRIDE

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

Benjamin Galloway for

JASON HITT

Assistant U.S. Attorney

Attorney for Plaintiff

ORDER

Based on the stipulation of the parties and good cause appearing therefrom, the Court hereby adopts the stipulation of the parties in its entirety as its order. It is hereby ordered that the presently set October 18, 2011, status conference shall be continued to December 6, 2011, at 9:15 a.m.. It is further ordered that the time period from the date of the parties' stipulation, October 3, 2011, through and including the date of the new status conference hearing, December 6, 2011, shall be excluded from computation of time within which the trial of this matter must be commenced under the Speedy Trial Act, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161 (h)(7)(B)(iv) and Local Code T4 [reasonable time for defense counsel to prepare].

Based on the stipulation of the parties and good cause appearing therefrom, the Court hereby finds that the failure to grant a continuance in this case would deny defense counsel reasonable time for effective preparation taking into account the exercise of due diligence. The Court specifically finds that the ends of justice served by the granting of such continuance outweigh the interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

In addition, the Court further ORDERS the United States Probation Office to prepare and disclose to the parties a pre-plea advisory guideline presentence investigation report.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

LAWRENCE K. KARLTON

SENIOR JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


Summaries of

United States v. Pride

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 7, 2011
Cr.S. 11-170-LKK (E.D. Cal. Oct. 7, 2011)
Case details for

United States v. Pride

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. MARCUS DESHAUN PRIDE, Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 7, 2011

Citations

Cr.S. 11-170-LKK (E.D. Cal. Oct. 7, 2011)