From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Pride

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 23, 2012
CR. S. 11-170-LKK (E.D. Cal. Jul. 23, 2012)

Opinion

CR. S. 11-170-LKK

07-23-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. MARCUS DESHAUN PRIDE, Defendants.

Respectfully submitted, DANIEL J. BRODERICK Federal Defender BENJAMIN GALLOWAY Assistant Federal Defender Attorney for Defendant MARCUS PRIDE BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney Benjamin Galloway for JASON HITT Assistant U.S. Attorney Attorney for Plaintiff


DANIEL J. BRODERICK, Bar# 89424

Federal Defender

BENJAMIN D. GALLOWAY, Bar# 214897

Assistant Federal Defender

Attorney for Defendant

MARCUS DESHAUN PRIDE

STIPULATION AND ORDER


DATE: August 7, 2012

JUDGE: Hon. Lawrence K. Karlton

It is hereby stipulated and agreed to between the United States of America through JASON HITT, Assistant U.S. Attorney, and defendant, MARCUS DESHAUN PRIDE by and through his counsel, BENJAMIN GALLOWAY, Assistant Federal Defender that the status conference set for Tuesday, July 24, 2012, be continued to Tuesday, August 7, 2012, at 9:15 a.m., for status conference.

The reason for this continuance is to allow defense counsel additional time to review discovery with the defendant, to examine possible defenses and to continue investigating the facts of the case.

It is further stipulated that the time period from the date of this stipulation, July 24, 2012, through and including the date of the new status conference, August 7, 2012, shall be excluded from computation of time within which the trial of this matter must be commenced under the Speedy Trial Act, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161 (h)(7)(B)(iv)and Local Code T4 [reasonable time for defense counsel to prepare], and that the ends of justice served by the granting of such continuance outweigh the interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

Respectfully submitted,

DANIEL J. BRODERICK

Federal Defender

______________

BENJAMIN GALLOWAY

Assistant Federal Defender

Attorney for Defendant

MARCUS PRIDE

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

Benjamin Galloway for

JASON HITT

Assistant U.S. Attorney

Attorney for Plaintiff

ORDER

Based on the stipulation of the parties and good cause appearing therefrom, the Court hereby adopts the stipulation of the parties in its entirety as its order. It is hereby ordered that the presently set July 24, 2012, status conference shall be continued to August 7, 2012, at 9:15 a.m.. It is further ordered that the time period from the date of the parties' stipulation, July 20, 2012, through and including the date of the new status conference hearing, August 7, 2012, shall be excluded from computation of time within which the trial of this matter must be commenced under the Speedy Trial Act, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161 (h)(7)(B)(iv) and Local Code T4 [reasonable time for defense counsel to prepare].

Based on the stipulation of the parties and good cause appearing therefrom, the Court hereby finds that the failure to grant a continuance in this case would deny defense counsel reasonable time for effective preparation taking into account the exercise of due diligence. The Court specifically finds that the ends of justice served by the granting of such continuance outweigh the interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

______________

LAWRENCE K. KARLTON

SENIOR JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


Summaries of

United States v. Pride

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 23, 2012
CR. S. 11-170-LKK (E.D. Cal. Jul. 23, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Pride

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. MARCUS DESHAUN PRIDE, Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jul 23, 2012

Citations

CR. S. 11-170-LKK (E.D. Cal. Jul. 23, 2012)