From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Potts

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 25, 2011
No. CRS 06 0441 GEB (E.D. Cal. Aug. 25, 2011)

Opinion

No. CRS 06 0441 GEB

08-25-2011

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. AARON POTTS, Defendant.

Timothy E. Warriner Attorney at Law Attorney for defendant, AARON POTTS Jill Thomas, Assistant United States Attorney, for the Government


Timothy E. Warriner

Attorney at Law

Attorney for defendant,

AARON POTTS

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR CONTINUANCE OF

STATUS CONFERENCE AND FOR EXCLUSION OF TIME

Counsel for the government, Jill Thomas, and counsel for defendant Aaron Potts, Timothy E. Warriner, hereby jointly request that the status conference now scheduled for August 26, 2011, be continued to September 30, 2011 at 9:00 a.m., and that time continue to be excluded to September 30, 2011 for preparation of counsel (Local Code T 4; 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv)). Exclusion of time is requested as additional time is needed for counsel to review and evaluate the pre-plea presentence report and written plea agreement, to meet with the client, who is housed in the Butte County Jail, concerning the pre-plea report and plea agreement, and to continue plea negotiations with the Government. The parties stipulate that the ends of justice served by this continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

Respectfully submitted.

Tim Warriner, Attorney for

Defendant, Aaron Lamar Potts

Jill Thomas, Assistant United

States Attorney, for the Government

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, it is hereby ordered that the status conference set for August 26, 2011 be continued to September 30, 2011 at 9:00 a.m., and that time continue to be excluded to September 30, 2011 for preparation of counsel (Local Code T 4; 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv)). The court finds that the ends of justice served by the granting of the continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. (18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A).)

GARLAND E. EURRELL, JR.

United States District Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Potts

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 25, 2011
No. CRS 06 0441 GEB (E.D. Cal. Aug. 25, 2011)
Case details for

United States v. Potts

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. AARON POTTS, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Aug 25, 2011

Citations

No. CRS 06 0441 GEB (E.D. Cal. Aug. 25, 2011)