From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Potepalov

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 28, 2011
No. 2:11-CR-00295 MCE (E.D. Cal. Sep. 28, 2011)

Opinion

No. 2:11-CR-00295 MCE

09-28-2011

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. SERGEY POTEPALOV, et al., Defendants.

MICHAEL E. HANSEN Attorney for Defendant SERGEY POTEPALOV Michael E. Hansen for HAYES GABLE, III Attorney for Defendant KEITH O'NEIL DANIEL J. BRODERICK Federal Defender Michael E. Hansen for BENJAMIN GALLOWAY Assistant Federal Defender Attorney for Defendant MARLA BRENNAN Michael E. Hansen for CHRISTOPHER HAYDN-MYER Attorney for Defendant PAVEL BEREZENKO Michael E. Hansen for DWIGHT SAMUEL Attorney for Defendant BRIAN BARNES Michael E. Hansen for MICHAEL BIGELOW Attorney for Defendant ANTHONY RIVERA Michael E. Hansen for MICHAEL LONG Attorney for Defendant VERANIKA KOUSHAL Michael E. Hansen for DINA SANTOS Attorney for Defendant MARLENA COLVIN BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney Michael E. Hansen for DANIEL McCONKIE, JR. Assistant U.S. Attorney Attorney for Plaintiff


Michael E. Hansen

Attorney at Law, SBN 191737

Attorney for Defendant

SERGEY POTEPALOV

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO

CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE,

AND TO EXCLUDE TIME PURSUANT

TO THE SPEEDY TRIAL ACT

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto through their respective counsel, Daniel McConkie, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, attorney for plaintiff; Michael E. Hansen, attorney for defendant Sergey Potepalov; Hayes Gable, III, attorney for defendant Keith O'Neil; Benjamin Galloway, attorney for defendant Marla Brennan; Christopher Haydn-Myer, attorney for defendant Pavel Berezenko; Dwight Samuel, attorney for defendant Brian Barnes; Michael Bigelow, attorney for defendant Anthony Rivera; Michael Long, attorney for defendant Veranika Koushal; and Dina Santos, attorney for defendant Marlena Colvin, that the previously-scheduled status conference date of September 29, 2010, be vacated and the matter set for status conference on January 5, 2012, at 9:00 a.m., for all defendants except Olga Nekrasova.

This continuance is requested to allow counsel additional time to review discovery with the defendants, to examine possible defenses and to continue investigating the facts of the case. The Government concurs with this request.

Further, the parties agree and stipulate the ends of justice served by the granting of such a continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial and that time within which the trial of this case must be commenced under the Speedy Trial Act should therefore be excluded under 18 U.S.C. sections 3161(h)(7)(B)(ii) and (iv), corresponding to Local Codes T2 [complex case] and T4 [reasonable time for defense counsel to prepare], from the date of the parties' stipulation, September 26, 2011, to and including January 5, 2012. The Court previously excluded time pursuant to Local Code T2 on August 11, 2011.

Accordingly, the parties respectfully request the Court adopt this proposed stipulation.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Respectfully submitted,

MICHAEL E. HANSEN

Attorney for Defendant

SERGEY POTEPALOV

Michael E. Hansen for

HAYES GABLE, III

Attorney for Defendant

KEITH O'NEIL

DANIEL J. BRODERICK

Federal Defender

Michael E. Hansen for

BENJAMIN GALLOWAY

Assistant Federal Defender

Attorney for Defendant

MARLA BRENNAN

Michael E. Hansen for

CHRISTOPHER HAYDN-MYER

Attorney for Defendant

PAVEL BEREZENKO

Michael E. Hansen for

DWIGHT SAMUEL

Attorney for Defendant

BRIAN BARNES

Michael E. Hansen for

MICHAEL BIGELOW

Attorney for Defendant

ANTHONY RIVERA

Michael E. Hansen for

MICHAEL LONG

Attorney for Defendant

VERANIKA KOUSHAL

Michael E. Hansen for

DINA SANTOS

Attorney for Defendant

MARLENA COLVIN

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

Michael E. Hansen for

DANIEL McCONKIE, JR.

Assistant U.S. Attorney

Attorney for Plaintiff

ORDER

The Court, having received, read, and considered the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing therefrom, adopts the stipulation of the parties in its entirety as its order. Based on the stipulation of the parties and the recitation of facts contained therein, the Court finds that it is unreasonable to expect adequate preparation for pretrial proceedings and trial itself within the time limits established in 18 U.S.C. section 3161. In addition, the Court specifically finds that the failure to grant a continuance in this case would deny defense counsel to this stipulation reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. The Court finds that the ends of justice to be served by granting the requested continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial.

The Court orders that the time from the date of the parties' stipulation, September 26, 2011, to and including January 5, 2012, shall be excluded from computation of time within which the trial of this case must be commenced under the Speedy Trial Act, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. sections 3161(h)(7)(B)(ii) and (iv), and Local Codes T2 [complex case] and T4 [reasonable time for defense counsel to prepare]. It is further ordered that the September 29, 2011, status conference shall be continued until January 5, 2012, at 9:00 a.m., for all defendants except Olga Nekrasova.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Potepalov

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 28, 2011
No. 2:11-CR-00295 MCE (E.D. Cal. Sep. 28, 2011)
Case details for

United States v. Potepalov

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. SERGEY POTEPALOV, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Sep 28, 2011

Citations

No. 2:11-CR-00295 MCE (E.D. Cal. Sep. 28, 2011)