From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Porter

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION
Aug 2, 2011
CRIMINAL NO. H-11-532 (S.D. Tex. Aug. 2, 2011)

Opinion

CRIMINAL NO. H-11-532

08-02-2011

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JAMES WALTER PORTER, JR.


ORDER OF DETENTION PENDING TRIAL

In accordance with the Bail Reform Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3142(f), the Government moved for detention pending trial and the Defendant waived his right to a detention hearing. That waiver of detention hearing is entered in the record as Dkt. No. 15 . I conclude that the following facts are established by a preponderance of the evidence or clear and convincing evidence and require the detention of the above-named defendant pending trial in this case.

Findings of Fact

[ ] A. Findings of Fact [18 U.S.C. § 3142(e), § 3142(f)(1)].

[ ] (1) The defendant has been convicted of a (federal offense) (state or local offense that would have been a federal offense if a circumstance giving rise to federal jurisdiction had existed) that is
[ ] a crime of violence as defined in 18 U.S.C. § 3156(a)(4).
[ ] an offense for which the maximum sentence is life imprisonment or death.
[ ] an offense for which a maximum term of imprisonment of ten years or more is prescribed in 21 U.S.C. () § 801 et seq. () § 951 et seq. () § 955(a).
[ ] a felony that was committed after the defendant had been convicted of two or more prior federal offenses described in 18 U.S.C. § 3142(f)(1) (A)-(C), or comparable state or local offenses.
[ ] (2) The offense described in finding 1 was committed while the defendant was on release pending trial for a federal, state or local offense.
[ ] (3) A period of not more than five years has elapsed since the (date of conviction) (release of the defendant from imprisonment) for the offense described in finding 1.
[ ] (4) Findings Nos. 1, 2, and 3 establish a rebuttable presumption that no condition or combination of conditions will reasonably assure the safety of any other person and the
community. I further find that the defendant has not rebutted this presumption.

[X ] B. Findings of Fact [18 U.S.C. § 3142(e)]

[X] (1) There is probable cause to believe that the defendant has committed an offense
[ ] for which a maximum term of imprisonment of ten years or more is prescribed in 21 U.S.C.
() § 801 et seq. () § 951 et seq. () § 955(a).
[ ] under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c).
[X] involving a minor victim under 18 U.S.C. § 2252A(a)(2).
[ X] (2) The defendant has not rebutted the presumption established by finding 1 that no condition or combination of conditions will reasonably assure the appearance of the defendant as required or the safety of the community.

[X] C. Findings of Fact [18 U.S.C. § 3142(f)(2)]

[X] (1) Defendant is accused of receipt and possession of child pornography.
[X] (2) There is a serious risk that the defendant will flee.
[X] (3) Defendant represents a danger to the community.
[ ] (4) There is a serious risk that the defendant will (obstruct or attempt to obstruct justice) (threaten, injure, or intimidate a prospective witness or juror, or attempt to do so).

[X ] D. Findings of Fact [18 U.S.C. § 3142(c)]

[ ] (1) As a condition of release of the defendant, bond was set as follows:
[ ] (2)
[X] (3) I find that there is no condition or combination of conditions set forth in 18 U.S.C. 3142(c) which will reasonably assure the appearance of the defendant as required.
[X] (4) I find that there is no condition or combination of conditions set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3142(c) which will reasonably assure the safety of the community.

Written Statement of Reasons for Detention

I find that the accusations in the indictment and the information submitted in the Pretrial Services Agency report establish by a preponderance of the evidence that no condition or combination of conditions will reasonably assure the appearance of the defendant as required and by clear and convincing evidence that there is no condition or combination of conditions of release that would reasonably assure the safety of the community.

I conclude that the following factors specified in 18 U.S.C. § 3142(g) are present and are to be taken into account:

1. Defendant is a 57 year-old naturalized citizen of the United States born in Germany. He has lived in Texas for 18 years. He maintains no contact with family. Defendant reports that his passport is expired and he last traveled outside the United States in 1983 with the Army. He is unemployed and reports prior employment as a postal carrier.
2. Defendant's criminal history includes state court charges apparently related to this federal offense.
3. Defendant is charged with receipt and possession of child pornography in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252. He faces a potential penalty of up to 20 years in prison..
4. Defendant has no stable employment or family history. He has received treatment for anxiety and suicidal thoughts. At the time of this arrest, he was in possession of children's undergarments. He has a concealed handgun, and at the time of arrest was in possession of a CNS military grade grenade.
5. Defendant has not rebutted the statutory presumptions that he is a flight risk and a danger to the community.
6. There is no condition or combination of conditions of release which would assure defendant's appearance in court or the safety of the community. Detention is ordered.

Directions Regarding Detention

It is therefore ORDERED that the defendant is committed to the custody of the Attorney General or his designated representative for confinement in a corrections facility separate, to the extent practicable, from persons awaiting or serving sentences or being held in custody pending appeal. The defendant shall be afforded a reasonable opportunity for private consultation with defense counsel. On order of a court of the United States or on request of an attorney for the Government, the person in charge of the corrections facility shall deliver the defendant to the United States Marshal for the purpose of an appearance in connection with all court proceedings.

Signed at Houston, Texas on August 2, 2011.

Stephen Wm. Smith

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Porter

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION
Aug 2, 2011
CRIMINAL NO. H-11-532 (S.D. Tex. Aug. 2, 2011)
Case details for

United States v. Porter

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JAMES WALTER PORTER, JR.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION

Date published: Aug 2, 2011

Citations

CRIMINAL NO. H-11-532 (S.D. Tex. Aug. 2, 2011)