From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Popoola

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Oct 14, 2022
No. 21-6058 (4th Cir. Oct. 14, 2022)

Opinion

21-6058

10-14-2022

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. BABATUNDE EMMANUEL POPOOLA, a/k/a Emmanuel Popoola, a/k/a Tunde Popoola, Defendant-Appellant.

Babatunde Emmanuel Popoola, Appellant Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED

Submitted: September 30, 2022

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Paul W. Grimm, District Judge. (8:15-cr-00277-PWG-5; 8:20-cv-00006-PWG)

Babatunde Emmanuel Popoola, Appellant Pro Se.

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM.

Babatunde Emmanuel Popoola seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent "a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right." 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists could find the district court's assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong. See Buck v. Davis, 137 S.Ct. 759, 773-74 (2017). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Gonzalez v. Thaler, 565 U.S. 134, 140-41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000)).

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Popoola has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny Popoola's motion for bail or release pending appeal, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.


Summaries of

United States v. Popoola

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Oct 14, 2022
No. 21-6058 (4th Cir. Oct. 14, 2022)
Case details for

United States v. Popoola

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. BABATUNDE EMMANUEL…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Oct 14, 2022

Citations

No. 21-6058 (4th Cir. Oct. 14, 2022)