From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Polizzi

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Oct 18, 1971
450 F.2d 880 (9th Cir. 1971)

Opinion

No. 71-1341.

October 18, 1971.

Edward P. George, Jr. (argued), of Allen, Wilson George, Long Beach, Cal., Edward I. Pollock (argued), of Pollock, Pollock, Fay Baum, Los Angeles, Cal., Leonard Sacks, Pico Rivera, Cal., for appellant.

Alan Friedman, Asst. U.S. Atty. (argued), David R. Nissen, Asst. U.S. Atty., Robert L. Meyer, U.S. Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California; A. Andrew Hauk, Judge, 323 F. Supp. 222.

Before HAMLEY, HAMLIN and KILKENNY, Circuit Judges.


Under the unique circumstances of this case, Michael Polizzi was not guilty of willful disobedience of a subpoena to appear before a federal grand jury on the date therein specified. It was therefore error to adjudge Polizzi guilty of criminal contempt pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 401(3), and to impose a fine of $7,500.

Reversed.


Summaries of

United States v. Polizzi

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Oct 18, 1971
450 F.2d 880 (9th Cir. 1971)
Case details for

United States v. Polizzi

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE, v. MICHAEL POLIZZI, APPELLANT

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Oct 18, 1971

Citations

450 F.2d 880 (9th Cir. 1971)

Citing Cases

Arandell Corp. v. XCEL Energy Inc. (In re W. States Wholesale Nat. Gas Antitrust Litig. )

Failure to comply with a federal subpoena may be prosecuted as criminal contempt under 18 U.S.C. § 401(3).…