From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Pohl

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
Sep 11, 2020
No. 20-10005 (11th Cir. Sep. 11, 2020)

Opinion

No. 20-10005

09-11-2020

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. FREDERICK MICHAEL POHL, JR., Defendant-Appellant.


[DO NOT PUBLISH] Non-Argument Calendar D.C. Docket No. 5:19-cr-00045-JDW-PRL-1 Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida Before JILL PRYOR, BRANCH and BRASHER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

Lynn Bailey, appointed counsel for Frederick Michael Pohl, Jr., in this direct criminal appeal, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel's assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Pohl's conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

United States v. Pohl

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
Sep 11, 2020
No. 20-10005 (11th Cir. Sep. 11, 2020)
Case details for

United States v. Pohl

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. FREDERICK MICHAEL POHL…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Sep 11, 2020

Citations

No. 20-10005 (11th Cir. Sep. 11, 2020)