Opinion
2:20-cr-00032-JCM-EJY
11-03-2022
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. DANIEL PLATA AND JONATHAN PAVON Defendant.
RENE L. VALLADARES Federal Public Defender JASON M. FRIERSON United States Attorney NAVID AFSHAR Assistant Federal Public Counsel for Daniel Plata JEAN RIPLEY Defender Assistant United States Attorney THERESA A. RISTENPART Counsel for Jonathan Pavon Attorney for Daniel Plata
RENE L. VALLADARES Federal Public Defender
JASON M. FRIERSON United States Attorney
NAVID AFSHAR Assistant Federal Public Counsel for Daniel Plata
JEAN RIPLEY Defender Assistant United States Attorney
THERESA A. RISTENPART Counsel for Jonathan Pavon
Attorney for Daniel Plata
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE DEADLINE FOR SENTENCING MEMORANDUM (SECOND REQUEST)
JAMES C. MAHAN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between Jason M. Frierson, United States Attorney, and Jean Ripley, Assistant United States Attorney, counsel for the United States of America, and Rene L. Valladares, Federal Public Defender, and Navid Afshar, Assistant Federal Public Defender, counsel for Daniel Plata, and Theresa A. Ristenpart, counsel for Jonathan Pavon, that the Sentencing Memorandum deadline for Tuesday, November 1, 2022, be continued to Wednesday, November 2, 2022.
The Stipulation is entered into for the following reasons:
1. Due to an unexpected issue, counsel was unable to file the memorandum on 11/1/22. ECF No. 87.
2. After discussion with government, there was agreement to file it on 11/2/2022 instead. Counsel is filing the memorandum contemporaneous to this stipulation.
3. Defendant is not in custody.
4. The parties agree to the continuance.
5. The additional time requested is not sought for purposes of delay, but merely to allow counsel sufficient time within which to be able to effectively and thoroughly complete the memorandum.
6. Additionally, denial of this request for continuance could result in a miscarriage of justice. The additional time requested by this Stipulation is excludable in computing the time within which the trial must commence pursuant to the Speedy Trial Act, Title 18, United States Code, Section 3161(h)(7)(A), considering the factors under Title 18, United States Code, Section 3161(h)(7)(B)(i), (iv).
This is the second stipulation to continue.
FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND ORDER
FINDINGS OF FACT
Based on the pending Stipulation of counsel, and good cause appearing therefore, the Court finds that:
1. Counsel waiting for confirmation on information relevant to sentencing memorandum. Counsel will file memorandum as soon as received.
2. Defendants are not in custody.
3. The parties agree to the continuance.
4. The additional time requested is not sought for purposes of delay, but merely to allow counsel sufficient time within which to be able to effectively and thoroughly complete the memorandum.
5. Additionally, denial of this request for continuance could result in a miscarriage of justice. The additional time requested by this Stipulation is excludable in computing the time within which the trial must commence pursuant to the Speedy Trial Act, Title 18, United States Code, Section 3161(h)(7)(A), considering the factors under Title 18, United States Code, Section 3161(h)(7)(B)(i), (iv).
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
The ends of justice served by granting said continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial, since the failure to grant said continuance would be likely to result in a miscarriage of justice, would deny the parties sufficient time and the opportunity within which to be able to effectively and thoroughly prepare for trial, taking into account the exercise of due diligence.
The continuance sought is excludable under the Speedy Trial Act, Title 18, United States Code, Section § 3161 (h)(7)(A), when the considering the factors under Title 18, United States Code, § 3161(h)(7)(B)(i), (iv).
ORDER
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that sentencing memorandum must be electronically submitted to the Court by November 2, 2022. .