From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Plancarte

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Nov 29, 2011
No. CR 11-0758 EMC (N.D. Cal. Nov. 29, 2011)

Opinion

No. CR 11-0758 EMC

11-29-2011

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JESUS YANEZ PLANCARTE, a/k/a Mario Pacheco Pulido, Defendant.

MELINDA HAAG (CABN 132612) United States Attorney MIRANDA KANE (CABN 150630) Chief, Criminal Division SUSAN PHAN (CABN 241637) Special Assistant United States Attorney Attorneys for the United States of America


MELINDA HAAG (CABN 132612)

United States Attorney

MIRANDA KANE (CABN 150630)

Chief, Criminal Division

SUSAN PHAN (CABN 241637)

Special Assistant United States Attorney

Attorneys for the United States of America

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXCLUDING TIME UNDER 18 U.S.C. § 3161

The defendant appeared for his initial status conference before this Court on November 3, 2011. The parties requested a pre-plea Pre-Sentencing Report (PSR) for Mr. Yanez-Plancante. Defense counsel represented that the pre-plea PSR will aid Mr. Yanez-Plancante's understanding of the potential sentence he may face in this case. The parties have agreed to exclude the period of time between November 3, 2011 to December 14, 2011, from any time limits applicable under 18 U.S.C. § 3161. The parties represented that granting the exclusion would allow the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation of counsel. See 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv). The parties also agree that good cause exists, and that the ends of justice served by granting such an exclusion of time outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A). At the hearing, the Court made findings consistent with this agreement. SO STIPULATED:

MELINDA HAAG

United States Attorney

SUSAN PHAN

Special Assistant U.S. Attorney

JODI LINKER

Attorney for JESUS YANEZ-PLANCARTE

[PROPOSED] ORDER

For the reasons stated above at the November 3, 2011 status conference, the Court finds that the exclusion from the time limits applicable under 18 U.S.C. § 3161 of the period from November 3, 2011 to December 14, 2011 is warranted and that good cause exists, and the ends of justice served by the continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. 18 U.S.C. §3161(h)(7)(A).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Judge Edward M. Chen


Summaries of

United States v. Plancarte

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Nov 29, 2011
No. CR 11-0758 EMC (N.D. Cal. Nov. 29, 2011)
Case details for

United States v. Plancarte

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JESUS YANEZ PLANCARTE, a/k/a Mario…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Date published: Nov 29, 2011

Citations

No. CR 11-0758 EMC (N.D. Cal. Nov. 29, 2011)