From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Pittman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
Jan 7, 2013
No. 3:10-cr-00046 (M.D. Tenn. Jan. 7, 2013)

Opinion

No. 3:10-cr-00046

01-07-2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. STEVEN DWAYNE PITTMAN

JERRY E. MARTIN United States Attorney for the Middle District of Tennessee BRADEN H.BOUCEK Assistant United States Attorney


JUDGE HAYNES


MOTION TO CONTINUE TIME TO RESPOND

The United States of America, by and through Jerry E. Martin, United States Attorney for the Middle District of Tennessee, and Braden H. Boucek, Assistant United States Attorney, respectfully requests thirty days in which to respond to the defendant's Motion to Suppress Evidence, docket no. 94. In support thereof, the United States submits that the defendant has already filed a motion to suppress supported by lengthy filings. The latest motion contains a new argument requiring substantial preparation. Undersigned counsel has a full calendar and respectfully submits a continuance of 30 days, or until February 1, 2013, to respond. Defense counsel does not object.

Respectfully Submitted,

JERRY E. MARTIN

United States Attorney for the

Middle District of Tennessee

By: ______________

BRADEN H.BOUCEK

Assistant United States Attorney


Summaries of

United States v. Pittman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
Jan 7, 2013
No. 3:10-cr-00046 (M.D. Tenn. Jan. 7, 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Pittman

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. STEVEN DWAYNE PITTMAN

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION

Date published: Jan 7, 2013

Citations

No. 3:10-cr-00046 (M.D. Tenn. Jan. 7, 2013)