From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Pirt

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 5, 2012
No. CR-S-11-468 WBS (E.D. Cal. Jan. 5, 2012)

Opinion

No. CR-S-11-468 WBS

01-05-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. STEPHEN DOUGLAS PIRT, et al., Defendants.

SCOTT L. TEDMON Attorney for Defendant Stephen Douglas Pirt JOSEPH J. WISEMAN Attorney for Defendant Janis Santana Pirt JOHN R. MANNING Attorney for Defendant Erik Hermann Green Benjamin B. Wagner United States Attorney MICHAEL D. ANDERSON Assistant U.S. Attorney


JOHN R. MANNING (SBN 220874)

ATTORNEY AT LAW

Attorney for Defendant

ERIK HERMANN GREEN

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED ORDER] CONTINUING STATUS CONFERENCE


Judge: Honorable William B. Shubb

IT IS HEREBY stipulated between the United States of America through its undersigned counsel, Michael D. Anderson, Assistant United States Attorney, together with counsel for defendant Stephen Douglas Pirt, Scott L. Tedmon, Esq., counsel for defendant Janis Santana Pirt, Joseph J. Wiseman, Esq., and counsel for defendant Erik Hermann Green, John R. Manning, Esq., that the status conference presently set for January 9, 2012 be continued to February 27, 2012, at 9:30 a.m., thus vacating the presently set status conference.

Defense counsel requires additional time to review the discovery and perform investigation. Therefore, counsel for the parties stipulate and agree that the interests of justice served by granting this continuance outweigh the best interests of the defendants and the public in a speedy trial. 18 U.S.C. 3161(h)(7)(A) (continuity of counsel/ reasonable time for effective preparation) and Local Code T4, and agree to exclude time from the date of the filing of the order until the date of the status conference, February 27, 2012. IT IS SO STIPULATED.

_________

SCOTT L. TEDMON

Attorney for Defendant

Stephen Douglas Pirt

____________

JOSEPH J. WISEMAN

Attorney for Defendant

Janis Santana Pirt

_________

JOHN R. MANNING

Attorney for Defendant

Erik Hermann Green

Benjamin B. Wagner

United States Attorney

by: _________

MICHAEL D. ANDERSON

Assistant U.S. Attorney

JOHN R. MANNING (SBN 220874)

ATTORNEY AT LAW

Attorney for Defendant

ERIK HERMANN GREEN

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff,

v.

STEPHEN DOUGLAS PIRT, et al., Defendants.

No. CR-S-11-468 WBS

ORDER TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERNCE

The Court, having received, read, and considered the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing therefrom, adopts the stipulation of the parties in its entirety as its order. Based on the stipulation of the parties and the recitation of facts contained therein, the Court finds that it is unreasonable to expect adequate preparation for pretrial proceedings and trial itself within the time limits established in 18 U.S.C. § 3161. In addition, the Court specifically finds that the failure to grant a continuance in this case would deny defense counsel to this stipulation reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. The Court finds that the ends of justice to be served by granting the requested continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial.

The Court orders that the time from the date of the parties' stipulation, January 3, 2012, to and including February 27, 2012, shall be excluded from computation of time within which the trial of this case must be commenced under the Speedy Trial Act, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(ii) and (iv), and Local Codes T4 (reasonable time for defense counsel to prepare). It is further ordered that the January 9, 2012, status conference shall be continued until February 27, 2012, at 9:30 a.m. IT IS SO ORDERED.

_________

WILLIAM B. SHUBB

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Pirt

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 5, 2012
No. CR-S-11-468 WBS (E.D. Cal. Jan. 5, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Pirt

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. STEPHEN DOUGLAS PIRT, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 5, 2012

Citations

No. CR-S-11-468 WBS (E.D. Cal. Jan. 5, 2012)