From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Pippins

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nov 23, 2022
No. 22-7027 (4th Cir. Nov. 23, 2022)

Opinion

22-7027

11-23-2022

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. CHARLES DUNCAN PIPPINS, a/k/a Chuck, Defendant-Appellant.

Charles Duncan Pippins, Appellant Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED

Submitted: November 17, 2022

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Huntington. Robert C. Chambers, District Judge. (3:17-cr-00007-1; 3:19-cv-00876)

Charles Duncan Pippins, Appellant Pro Se.

Before KING, QUATTLEBAUM, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM

Charles Duncan Pippins seeks to appeal the district court's amended order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge in part and denying relief on Pippins' 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent "a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right." 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists could find the district court's assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong. See Buck v. Davis, 137 S.Ct. 759, 773-74 (2017). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Gonzalez v. Thaler, 565 U.S. 134, 140-41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000)).

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Pippins has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED


Summaries of

United States v. Pippins

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nov 23, 2022
No. 22-7027 (4th Cir. Nov. 23, 2022)
Case details for

United States v. Pippins

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. CHARLES DUNCAN PIPPINS…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Nov 23, 2022

Citations

No. 22-7027 (4th Cir. Nov. 23, 2022)