From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Pineda-Soriano

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
May 25, 2021
No. 20-13010 (11th Cir. May. 25, 2021)

Opinion

No. 20-13010

05-25-2021

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ULISES PINEDA-SORIANO, Defendant-Appellant.


[DO NOT PUBLISH] Non-Argument Calendar D.C. Docket No. 8:20-cr-00127-RAL-TGW-1 Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida Before WILSON, MARTIN and JORDAN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

Melissa Fussell, appointed counsel for Ulises Pineda-Soriano in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel's assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Pineda-Soriano's conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

United States v. Pineda-Soriano

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
May 25, 2021
No. 20-13010 (11th Cir. May. 25, 2021)
Case details for

United States v. Pineda-Soriano

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ULISES PINEDA-SORIANO…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

Date published: May 25, 2021

Citations

No. 20-13010 (11th Cir. May. 25, 2021)