From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Pike

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Nov 19, 2012
2:09-CR-147 JCM (GWF) (D. Nev. Nov. 19, 2012)

Opinion

2:09-CR-147 JCM (GWF)

11-19-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. RUSSELL PIKE, Defendant.


ORDER

Presently before the court is defendant Russell Pike's motion for reconsideration of his motion to continue self surrender date. (Doc. # 217). Defendant filed a supplement. (Doc. # 218). The government filed a response (doc. # 219), and defendant replied (doc. # 220).

Defendant requests the court to reconsider its previous order denying defendant's motion continue his self surrender date. (Doc. # 217, 1:20-21). Defendant states that the court failed to address the most significant issue raised in his motion, the difficulties associated with surrendering directly to the U.S. Marshal's office. (Doc. # 217: 1:24-27). Defendant then filed a supplement for the motion to reconsider representing that defendant had been designated to the bureau of prisons camp facility in Mendota, California. (Doc. # 218, 1:23-24).

Defendant requests the court to consider the delay in notification of a designated facility, as defendant now has a relatively short amount of time to prepare his seven children and the rest of his family for his departure to Mendota. (Doc. # 217, 1:27-2:1).

The government opposes the motion. (Doc. # 219). The government states because defendant's motion for reconsideration was based on defendant not having been designated a bureau of prisons facility and since defendant now has been designated to a facility, there is nothing for the court to reconsider. (Doc. # 219, 2:1-3). The government states that this is another attempt for a delay. (Doc. # 219, 2:2).

Defendant responds, conceding that he is attempting to delay his self surrender date. Defendant, however, argues that it is not for the mere purpose of delay but to be able to spend time with his family for the holidays and properly prepare for his 52-months of incarceration. (Doc. # 220, 1:23-25).

The court finds that the instant motion does not contain any information not previously considered by the court. Thus, the circumstances presented here do not warrant reconsideration.

Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED defendant Russell Pike's motion for reconsideration of motion to continue self surrender date, (doc. # 217) be, and the same hereby is, DENIED.

_________________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Pike

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Nov 19, 2012
2:09-CR-147 JCM (GWF) (D. Nev. Nov. 19, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Pike

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. RUSSELL PIKE, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Nov 19, 2012

Citations

2:09-CR-147 JCM (GWF) (D. Nev. Nov. 19, 2012)