Opinion
CRIMINAL 19-20062
11-09-2022
United States of America, v. Jomar Mozer Pierre, Defendant.
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR COMPASSIONATE RELEASE
Robert N. Scola, Jr. United States District Judge
Before the Court is Defendant Jomar Mozer Pierre's motion for a sentence reduction/compassionate release under the First Step Act. For the reasons below, the Court denies the motion (ECF No. 93).
A Court may consider a defendant's motion for compassionate release “after the defendant has fully exhausted all administrative rights to appeal a failure of the Bureau of Prisons . . . to bring a motion on the defendant's behalf or the lapse of 30 days from the receipt of such a request by the warden of the defendant's facility, whichever is earlier.” 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A).
The Defendant makes no showing that he has exhausted his administrative remedies before the Bureau of Prisons. So, the Court must deny his motion. But even if the Defendant had exhausted those remedies, Section 3582 would also require the Court to find “extraordinary and compelling reasons” to warrant a reduction of the Defendant's sentence. 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i). No such reasons exist here.
The Defendant represents that the COVID-19 pandemic has produced conditions of imprisonment that warrant a finding of “extraordinary and compelling” circumstances. His chief complaints concern staffing shortages and exposure to the virus. (ECF No. 93 at 4). Clearly, neither factor truly results in “extraordinary and compelling” circumstances.
The Defendant's motion is denied. (ECF No. 640).
Done and ordered