Opinion
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION. (See Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure Rule 36-3)
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon, Michael R. Hogan, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CR-96-60144-MRH.
Ronald Eugene Pierce, pro se, heridan, OR,for Petitioner-Appellant.
Frank R. Papagni, Jr., Esq., USEU-Office of the U.S. Attorney, Eugene, OR, for Respondent-Appellee.
Before GOODWIN, WALLACE and MCKEOWN, Circuit Judges.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Ronald Eugene Pierce appeals pro se the district court's denial of his "petition for lack of jurisdiction under the Commerce Clause." Pierce contends that 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) is an unconstitutional exercise of Congress's authority under the Commerce Clause. We dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction.
All pending motions are denied.
DISMISSED.