From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Pickett

United States District Court, Northern District of Texas
Sep 7, 2021
CRIMINAL ACTION 3:20-CR-435-E (N.D. Tex. Sep. 7, 2021)

Opinion

CRIMINAL ACTION 3:20-CR-435-E

09-07-2021

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ANTONIO DESHUN PICKETT


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

ADA BROWN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

After reviewing all relevant matters of record in this case, including the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and any objections thereto, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the undersigned District Judge is of the opinion that the Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are accepted as the Findings and Conclusions of the Court.

The defendant's Motion to Suppress Evidence and Request for Evidentiary Hearing, filed May 10, 2021 (doc. 24), is DENIED.


Summaries of

United States v. Pickett

United States District Court, Northern District of Texas
Sep 7, 2021
CRIMINAL ACTION 3:20-CR-435-E (N.D. Tex. Sep. 7, 2021)
Case details for

United States v. Pickett

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ANTONIO DESHUN PICKETT

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of Texas

Date published: Sep 7, 2021

Citations

CRIMINAL ACTION 3:20-CR-435-E (N.D. Tex. Sep. 7, 2021)

Citing Cases

United States v. Franklin

“Absent a Fourth Amendment violation [that he was illegally detained], Defendant's consent to search was not…