From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Piatnitsky

United States District Court, D. New Jersey
May 8, 2024
CRIM. 2:24-mj-01043-ADB (D.N.J. May. 8, 2024)

Opinion

CRIM. 2:24-mj-01043-ADB

05-08-2024

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. MIKHAIL PIATNITSKY


ORDER REGARDING USE OF VIDEO CONFERENCING/TELECONFERENCING

Honorable Andrea D. Bergman United States Magistrate Judge

In accordance with the operative COVID-19 Standing Orders, this Court finds:

[√] That the Defendant, (or the Juvenile) has consented to the use of video teleconferencing/teleconferencing to conduct the proceeding(s) held today, after consultation with counsel; and

Tile proceeding(s)held on this date may be conducted by:

[√] Video Teleconferencing

[ ] Teleconferencing, because video teleconferencing is not reasonably available for the following reason:

[ ] The Defendant (or the Juvenile) is detained at a facility lacking video teleconferencing capability, [ ] Other:


Summaries of

United States v. Piatnitsky

United States District Court, D. New Jersey
May 8, 2024
CRIM. 2:24-mj-01043-ADB (D.N.J. May. 8, 2024)
Case details for

United States v. Piatnitsky

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. MIKHAIL PIATNITSKY

Court:United States District Court, D. New Jersey

Date published: May 8, 2024

Citations

CRIM. 2:24-mj-01043-ADB (D.N.J. May. 8, 2024)