From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Phillips

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Oct 15, 2018
No. 18-6344 (4th Cir. Oct. 15, 2018)

Opinion

No. 18-6344

10-15-2018

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. AROUS JOHN PHILLIPS, a/k/a AJ, a/k/a Villan, Defendant - Appellant.

Arous John Phillips, Appellant Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Arenda L. Wright Allen, District Judge. (2:10-cr-00048-AWA-TEM-4) Before FLOYD and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Arous John Phillips, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Arous John Phillips appeals the district court's order dismissing his motion filed under 18 U.S.C. § 3742 (2012). The district court held that § 3742 provides only for the filing of notice of direct appeal and concluded that any appeal would be untimely. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Phillips, No. 2:10-cr-00048-AWA-TEM-4 (E.D. Va. Feb. 21, 2018). We deny Phillips' motion for a transcript at Government expense. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

United States v. Phillips

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Oct 15, 2018
No. 18-6344 (4th Cir. Oct. 15, 2018)
Case details for

United States v. Phillips

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. AROUS JOHN PHILLIPS…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Oct 15, 2018

Citations

No. 18-6344 (4th Cir. Oct. 15, 2018)