From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Phila. Vision Ctr.

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Feb 1, 2022
Civil Action 20-2027 (E.D. Pa. Feb. 1, 2022)

Opinion

Civil Action 20-2027

02-01-2022

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA ex rel. ALISHA ALEJANDRO, Plaintiffs/Relator, v. PHILADELPHIA VISION CENTER, BARCO OPTICAL, INC., BRUCE RUBIN, AND DR. BETH BROOKS, Defendants.


ORDER

GERALD J. PAPPERT, J.

AND NOW, this 1st day of February, 2022, upon consideration of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Relator's Amended Complaint (ECF 46), Relator's Response (ECF 51) and consistent with the accompanying Memorandum of Law, it is ORDERED that Defendants' Motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as follows:

1. The Motion is DENIED with respect to those claims against Philadelphia Vision Center, Barco Optical and Bruce Rubin in Counts I and II of her Amended Complaint concerning thirty-four eye exam claims allegedly submitted for reimbursement between January 2016 and September 2017 using the National Provider Identifier number for Dr. Pollock. The Motion is GRANTED in all other respects.

2. Dr. Beth Brooks is terminated as a Defendant.

3. Defendants shall file their ANSWER on or before Wednesday, February 16, 2022.


Summaries of

United States v. Phila. Vision Ctr.

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Feb 1, 2022
Civil Action 20-2027 (E.D. Pa. Feb. 1, 2022)
Case details for

United States v. Phila. Vision Ctr.

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA ex rel. ALISHA…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Feb 1, 2022

Citations

Civil Action 20-2027 (E.D. Pa. Feb. 1, 2022)