From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Pettersen

United States District Court, Southern District of California
Dec 1, 2022
20-cr-2292-BAS-1 (S.D. Cal. Dec. 1, 2022)

Opinion

20-cr-2292-BAS-1

12-01-2022

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. DRAKE PETTERSEN, Defendant.


ORDER REGARDING LETTER

(ECF NO. 80)

HON. CYNTHIA BASHANT, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

The Court received a letter from Defendant Drake Pettersen. (ECF No. 80.) He asks for “an Eighth Amendment violation hearing,” stating that he has received inadequate medical care and has been placed in an isolated housing unit. (Id.)

The correct way for a defendant to address his “grievances regarding treatment within a jail or prison is to file a civil suit against the relevant parties . . . rather than a motion in his criminal case.” United States v. Velazquez Landeros, No. 1:20-cr-00161-JLT-SKO, 2022 WL 2906418, at *1 (E.D. Cal. July 22, 2022). In other words, Pettersen must file a separate civil rights case to raise an Eighth Amendment claim. Therefore, the Court denies Pettersen's request for a hearing in his criminal case.

In addition, the Court directs the Clerk of Court to mail Pettersen the Southern District's “Pro Se Packet Prisoner.” That packet includes instructions and forms for Pettersen to fill out if he chooses to file a civil suit.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

United States v. Pettersen

United States District Court, Southern District of California
Dec 1, 2022
20-cr-2292-BAS-1 (S.D. Cal. Dec. 1, 2022)
Case details for

United States v. Pettersen

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. DRAKE PETTERSEN, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of California

Date published: Dec 1, 2022

Citations

20-cr-2292-BAS-1 (S.D. Cal. Dec. 1, 2022)