From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Peterson

United States District Court, D. New Jersey
May 2, 2024
CRIM 24-mj-01036 (D.N.J. May. 2, 2024)

Opinion

CRIM 24-mj-01036

05-02-2024

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. MICHELLE PETERSON


ORDER REGARDING USE OF VIDEO CONFERENCING/TELECONFERENCING

HONORABLE ANDREA D. BERGMAN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

In accordance with the operative COVID-19 Standing Orders, this Court finds;

[√] That the Defendant (or the Juvenile) has consented to the use of video teleconferencing/teleconferencing to conduct the proceeding(s) held today, after consultation with counsel; and

The proceeding(s) held on this date may be conducted by; .

[√] Video Teleconferencing

[ ] Teleconferencing, because video teleconferencing is not reasonably available for the following reason:

[ ] The Defendant (or the Juvenile) is detained at a facility lacking video teleconferencing capability.

[ ] Other:


Summaries of

United States v. Peterson

United States District Court, D. New Jersey
May 2, 2024
CRIM 24-mj-01036 (D.N.J. May. 2, 2024)
Case details for

United States v. Peterson

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. MICHELLE PETERSON

Court:United States District Court, D. New Jersey

Date published: May 2, 2024

Citations

CRIM 24-mj-01036 (D.N.J. May. 2, 2024)