From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Perry

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Nov 26, 2013
547 F. App'x 240 (4th Cir. 2013)

Opinion

No. 13-7191

11-26-2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. GEORGE PERRY, a/k/a Fuzz, Defendant - Appellant.

George Perry, Appellant Pro Se. Eric Matthew Hurt, Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellee.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (4:07-cr-00153-RAJ-JEB-1) Before KING, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. George Perry, Appellant Pro Se. Eric Matthew Hurt, Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

George Perry appeals the district court's margin order denying his motion to reopen the appeal period in his criminal case so that he may challenge alleged sentencing amendments by the court. We have reviewed the record and found no qualifying order for which he sought a motion to reopen the appeal period. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

United States v. Perry

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Nov 26, 2013
547 F. App'x 240 (4th Cir. 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Perry

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. GEORGE PERRY, a/k/a…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Nov 26, 2013

Citations

547 F. App'x 240 (4th Cir. 2013)