From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Perm

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the District of Oregon
Nov 2, 2011
Case No: CR06-392-BR (D. Or. Nov. 2, 2011)

Opinion

Case No: CR06-392-BR USM No: 55887-065

11-02-2011

United States of America v. Kyllo Perm,

Susan Russell Defendant's Attorney


Date of Original Judgment: 09/23/2008

Date of Previous Amended Judgment: _____

(Use Date of Last Amended Judgment if Any)

Susan Russell

Defendant's Attorney

ORDER REGARDING MOTION FOR SENTENCE REDUCTION

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C, § 3582(c)(2)

Upon motion of [v] defendant []the Director of the Bureau of Prisons [] the court under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) for a reduction in the term of imprisonment imposed based on a guideline sentencing range that has subsequently been lowered and made retroactive by the United States Sentencing Commission pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 994(u), and having considered such motion, and taking into account the policy statement set forth at USSG § 1B 1.10 and the sentencing factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), to the extent that they are applicable,

IT IS ORDERED that the motion is:

[] denied. [v] GRANTED and the defendant's previously imposed sentence of imprisonment (as reflected in the last judgment issued) of 188 ________________________________

months is reduced to 121 months.

(Complete Parts I and II of Page 2 when motion is granted)

Except as otherwise provided, all provisions of the judgment dated 09/23/2008 shall remain in effect. IT IS SO ORDERED.

______

Judge's signature

Effective Date: _____

(if different from order date)

U.S. District Judge Anna Brown

Printed name and title

I. COURT DETERMINATION OF GUIDELINE RANGE//Ww to Any Departures)

Previous Total Offense Level: 32

Criminal History Category: III

Previous Guideline Range: 151 to 188 months

Amended Total Offense Level: 28

Criminal History Category: III

Amended Guideline Range: 97 to 121 months

II. SENTENCE RELATIVE TO THE AMENDED GUIDELINE RANGE [v] The reduced sentence is within the amended guideline range.

[] The previous term of imprisonment imposed was less than the guideline range applicable to the defendant at the time of sentencing as a result of a substantial assistance departure or Rule 35 reduction, and the reduced sentence is comparably less than the amended guideline range.

[] The reduced sentence is above the amended guideline range.

III. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS


Summaries of

United States v. Perm

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the District of Oregon
Nov 2, 2011
Case No: CR06-392-BR (D. Or. Nov. 2, 2011)
Case details for

United States v. Perm

Case Details

Full title:United States of America v. Kyllo Perm,

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the District of Oregon

Date published: Nov 2, 2011

Citations

Case No: CR06-392-BR (D. Or. Nov. 2, 2011)