From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Perez-Gallan

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Aug 2, 2023
No. 22-51019 (5th Cir. Aug. 2, 2023)

Opinion

22-51019

08-02-2023

United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Litsson Antonio Perez-Gallan, Defendant-Appellee.


Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 4:22-CR-427-1

Before DAVIS, STEWART, and OLDHAM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: [*]

The Government appeals the dismissal of an indictment charging Litsson Antonio Perez-Gallan under 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(8) with possession of a firearm by someone subject to a domestic violence restraining order. Perez-Gallan moves for summary affirmance, relying on United States v. Rahimi, 61 F.4th 443 (5th Cir. 2023), cert. granted, 2023 WL 4278450 (U.S. June 30, 2023) (No. 22-915). Alternatively, Perez-Gallan moves for an extension of time to file an appellee brief.

As the parties concede, the Government's appeal is foreclosed by Rahimi, 61 F.4th at 461. The grant of certiorari in Rahimi does not override this court's precedent. See Wicker v. McCotter, 798 F.2d 155, 157-58 (5th Cir. 1986).

Accordingly, Perez-Gallan's motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, his alternative motion for an extension of time to file his appellee brief is DENIED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. See Groendyke Transp., Inc. v. Davis, 406 F.2d 1158, 1162 (5th Cir. 1969).

[*] This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.


Summaries of

United States v. Perez-Gallan

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Aug 2, 2023
No. 22-51019 (5th Cir. Aug. 2, 2023)
Case details for

United States v. Perez-Gallan

Case Details

Full title:United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Litsson Antonio…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

Date published: Aug 2, 2023

Citations

No. 22-51019 (5th Cir. Aug. 2, 2023)

Citing Cases

Henry v. Vaella

We note that this area of the law has continued to evolve since the parties filed their briefs in this case.…