From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Perez-Fulgencio

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Mar 6, 2012
468 F. App'x 216 (4th Cir. 2012)

Opinion

No. 12-6045

03-06-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. CARLOS ALBERTO PEREZ-FULGENCIO, Defendant - Appellant.


UNPUBLISHED


Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Harrisonburg. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge. (5:01-cr-30058-SGW-1)

Before MOTZ, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Carlos Alberto Perez-Fulgencio, Appellant Pro Se. Grayson A. Hoffman, Jeb Thomas Terrien, Assistant United States Attorneys, Harrisonburg, Virginia; Ronald Mitchell Huber, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Carlos Perez-Fulgencio appeals the district court's order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Perez-Fulgencio, No. 5:01-cr-30058-SGW-1 (W.D. Va. Dec. 1, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

United States v. Perez-Fulgencio

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Mar 6, 2012
468 F. App'x 216 (4th Cir. 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Perez-Fulgencio

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. CARLOS ALBERTO…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Mar 6, 2012

Citations

468 F. App'x 216 (4th Cir. 2012)