From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Perez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Feb 1, 2013
2:12-CR-441 JCM (VCF) (D. Nev. Feb. 1, 2013)

Opinion

2:12-CR-441 JCM (VCF)

02-01-2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff(s), v. MIGUEL ANGEL PEREZ, Defendant(s).


ORDER

Presently before the court is defendant's motion waving Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32 disclosure time limits for expedited presentence report. (Doc. # 17).

Defendant requests an expedited presentence report due to the fact that the parties are recommending a sentence for time served. Without a Rule 32 waiver, probation will not be able to disclose the report within the time confines of Rule 32. Defense counsel has represented to the court that the defendant has waived the disclosure time limits imposed by Rule 32 as well as the right to have his attorney present during the interview with the probation officer. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that defendant's motion waving Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32 disclosure time limits for an expedited presentence report (doc. # 17) be, and the same hereby, is GRANTED.

_________________________________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Perez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Feb 1, 2013
2:12-CR-441 JCM (VCF) (D. Nev. Feb. 1, 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Perez

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff(s), v. MIGUEL ANGEL PEREZ…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Feb 1, 2013

Citations

2:12-CR-441 JCM (VCF) (D. Nev. Feb. 1, 2013)