From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Perera

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 2, 2011
Case No.: 2:10 CR 347 MCE (E.D. Cal. Sep. 2, 2011)

Opinion

Case No.: 2:10 CR 347 MCE

09-02-2011

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. DISHAN PERERA, et al, Defendant.

MICHAEL CHASTAINE Attorney for Jeremy Gachago MICHAEL D. LONG Attorney for Michael Tran ALAN BAUM Attorney for Dishan Perera MARK WAECKER Attorney for Imesh Perera SHARI RUSK Attorney for Torey Moore OLAF HEDBERG Attorney for Leonard Woodfork JOHN MANNING Attorney for Navpret Singh. CHRISTOPER HAYDEN-MYER Attorney for Love Sidhu MARK RECHEL Attorney for Navjot Singh DAN KOUKOL Attorney for Jason Caviler CHRIS COSCA Attorney for Ramiro Garcia BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney Michael Chastaine for Todd Leras Todd Leras Assistant U.S. Attorney


MICHAEL CHASTAINE, State Bar #121209

THE CHASTAINE LAW OFFICE

Attorneys for Defendant

Jeremy Gachago

STIPULATION AND ORDER

CONTINUING STATUS CONFERNCE

It is hereby stipulated between the parties, Todd Leras, Assistant United States Attorney, Alan Baum, attorney for defendant Dishan Perera, Michael Chastaine, attorney for Jeremy Gachago, Mark Waecker, attorney for defendant Imesh Perera, Shari Rusk, attorney for defendant Torey Moore and Michael Long, attorney for Michael Tran, Olaf Hedberg, attorney for defendant Leonard Woodfork, John Manning, attorney for Navpret Singh, Christopher Hayden-Myer, attorney for Love Sidhu, Mark Rechel, attorney for Navjot Singh, Chris Cosca, attorney for Ramiro Garcia and Dan Koukol attorney for Jason Caviler that the status conference date of Tuesday, September 6, 2011 should be continued until Tuesday November 3 , 2011. The continuance is necessary as all counsel are continuing to engage in negotiations with the government. Further, the government has indicated that it will be providing additional discovery that must be reviewed by the defense.

IT IS STIPULATED that the period of time from the September 6, 2011 up to and including November 3, 2011 be excluded in computing the time within which the trial must commence under the Speedy Trial Act, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §3161(h)(7) and Local Code T4, for ongoing preparation of counsel.

MICHAEL CHASTAINE

Attorney for Jeremy Gachago

MICHAEL D. LONG

Attorney for Michael Tran

ALAN BAUM

Attorney for Dishan Perera

MARK WAECKER

Attorney for Imesh Perera

SHARI RUSK

Attorney for Torey Moore

OLAF HEDBERG

Attorney for Leonard Woodfork

JOHN MANNING

Attorney for Navpret Singh.

CHRISTOPER HAYDEN-MYER

Attorney for Love Sidhu

MARK RECHEL

Attorney for Navjot Singh

DAN KOUKOL

Attorney for Jason Caviler

CHRIS COSCA

Attorney for Ramiro Garcia

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

Michael Chastaine for Todd Leras

Todd Leras

Assistant U.S. Attorney

ORDER

GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, in that it is the stipulation of the parties:

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the status conference scheduled for Tuesday, September 6, 2011 at 10:30 a.m. be continued to Tuesday, November 3, 2011 at 9:00 a.m. and that the period from September 6, 2011 to November 3, 2011 is excludable from calculation under the Speedy Trial Act pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §3161(h)(7) and local rule T4. The Court specifically finds that interests of justice served by granting this continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial. September 9, 2011

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Perera

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 2, 2011
Case No.: 2:10 CR 347 MCE (E.D. Cal. Sep. 2, 2011)
Case details for

United States v. Perera

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. DISHAN PERERA, et al, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Sep 2, 2011

Citations

Case No.: 2:10 CR 347 MCE (E.D. Cal. Sep. 2, 2011)