From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Penaloza-Carlon

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Apr 28, 2015
601 F. App'x 508 (9th Cir. 2015)

Opinion

No. 14-10239

04-28-2015

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. EDUARDO PENALOZA-CARLON, a.k.a. Eduarto Carlon Penaloza, Defendant - Appellant.


NOT FOR PUBLICATION

D.C. No. 4:12-cr-00727-JGZ MEMORANDUM Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona
Jennifer G. Zipps, District Judge, Presiding
Before: GOODWIN, BYBEE, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Eduardo Penaloza-Carlon appeals from the district court's judgment and challenges the time-served sentence imposed upon remand for resentencing. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Penaloza-Carlon's counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Penaloza-Carlon the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

United States v. Penaloza-Carlon

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Apr 28, 2015
601 F. App'x 508 (9th Cir. 2015)
Case details for

United States v. Penaloza-Carlon

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. EDUARDO…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Apr 28, 2015

Citations

601 F. App'x 508 (9th Cir. 2015)