From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Pena-Garcia

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
May 22, 2006
181 F. App'x 688 (9th Cir. 2006)

Opinion

Submitted May 15, 2006.

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION. (See Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure Rule 36-3)

Robert A. Bork, Esq., USLV--Office of the U.S. Attorney, Las Vegas, NV, for Plaintiff--Appellee.

Arthur L. Allen, Esq., FPDNV--Federal Public Defender's Office, Las Vegas, NV, for Defendant--Appellant.


Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada, Philip M. Pro, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CR-04-00306-PMP.

Before: B. FLETCHER, TROTT, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Efrain Pena-Garcia appeals from his sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction for unlawful reentry of a deported alien, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Garcia contends that district court err by sentencing him to a term of 52 months when he only pled to the elements of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a), which carries a maximum sentence of two years and that Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998) is no longer good law. This issue is foreclosed. See United States v. Weiland, 420 F.3d 1062, 1080 n. 16 (9th Cir.2005) (holding that we are bound to follow Almendarez-Torres even though it has been called into question, unless it is explicitly overruled by the Supreme Court).

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

United States v. Pena-Garcia

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
May 22, 2006
181 F. App'x 688 (9th Cir. 2006)
Case details for

United States v. Pena-Garcia

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff--Appellee, v. Efrain PENA-GARCIA…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: May 22, 2006

Citations

181 F. App'x 688 (9th Cir. 2006)