From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Pena

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 4, 2012
No. Cr.S. 10-468-JAM (E.D. Cal. Jan. 4, 2012)

Opinion

No. Cr.S. 10-468-JAM

01-04-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JOSE PENA, et al., Defendants.

DANIEL BRODERICK Federal Defender Assistant Federal Defender Attorney for Defendant Victor Cruz JESSE I. SANTANA Attorney for Defendant Leonardo Contreras MICHAEL LONG Attorney for Defendant Jose Pena ERIN RADEKIN Attorney for Defendant Damian Cervantes CARL LARSON Attorney for Defendant Oscar Virrueta HEIKO P. COPPOLA Assistant U.S. Attorney


DANIEL BRODERICK, Bar #89424

Federal Defender

BENJAMIN GALLOWAY, Bar #214897

Assistant Federal Defender

Attorney for Defendant

VICTOR CRUZ

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE

Judge: Honorable John A. Mendez

The parties request that the current status conference in this case be continued from January 10, 2012 to February 7, 2012 at 9:30 a.m.. The parties stipulate that the ends of justice are served by the Court excluding such time, so that counsel for the defendants may have reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv) and Local Code T-4.

Two of the undersigned entered the case relatively recently and need additional time to review the discovery and to conduct further investigation in this case focusing on the plant count, translated wire recordings, and other issues. In addition, another of the undersigned recently suffered an injury which greatly limits mobility and will preclude appearance the presently set status conference. For these reasons, the parties jointly request a new status conference date, and that the time period from January 4, 2012, to and including February 7, 2012 be excluded under the Speedy Trial Act pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161 (h)(8)(B)(iv) and Local Code T4 for defense preparation and based on a finding by the Court that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and defendants in a speedy trial.

Respectfully submitted,

DANIEL BRODERICK

Federal Defender

Ben Galloway

BENJAMIN GALLOWAY

Assistant Federal Defender

Attorney for Defendant

Victor Cruz

Jesse I. Santana

JESSE I. SANTANA

Attorney for Defendant

Leonardo Contreras

Michael Long

MICHAEL LONG

Attorney for Defendant

Jose Pena

Erin Radekin

ERIN RADEKIN

Attorney for Defendant

Damian Cervantes

Carl Larson

CARL LARSON

Attorney for Defendant

Oscar Virrueta

Heiko P. Coppola

HEIKO P. COPPOLA

Assistant U.S. Attorney

ORDER

Based on the stipulation of the parties and good cause appearing therefrom, the Court hereby finds that the failure to grant a continuance in this case would deny defense counsel reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. The Court specifically finds that the ends of justice served by the granting of such continuance outweigh the interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. Based on these findings and pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, the Court hereby adopts the stipulation of the parties in its entirety as its order. Time is excluded from computation of time within which the trial of this matter must be commenced beginning from the date of the stipulation, January 4, 2012, through and including February 7, 2012, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv) [reasonable time for defense counsel to prepare] and Local Code T4. A new status conference date is hereby set for February 7, 2012, at 9:30 a.m..

____________________________

JOHN A. MENDEZ

United States District Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Pena

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 4, 2012
No. Cr.S. 10-468-JAM (E.D. Cal. Jan. 4, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Pena

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JOSE PENA, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 4, 2012

Citations

No. Cr.S. 10-468-JAM (E.D. Cal. Jan. 4, 2012)