From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Pena

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 22, 2011
CASE NO. 2:10-CR-0468 JAM (E.D. Cal. Sep. 22, 2011)

Opinion

CASE NO. 2:10-CR-0468 JAM

09-22-2011

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JOSE PENA, et.al. Defendants.

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney HEIKO P. COPPOLA Assistant U.S. Attorney MICHAEL LONG Attorney for Defendant Jose Pena JESSE SANTANA Attorney for Defendant Leonardo Contreras BENJAMIN GALLOWAY Attorney for Defendant Victor Cruz ERIN RADEKIN Attorney for Defendant Damian Cervantes CARL LARSON Attorney for Defendant Oscar Virrueta


BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

HEIKO P. COPPOLA

Assistant U.S. Attorney

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXCLUDE TIME

The parties request that the status conference in this case be continued from September 27, 2011 to November 1, 2011 at 9:30 a.m. They stipulate that the time between September 27, 2011 and November 1, 2011 should be excluded from the calculation of time under the Speedy Trial Act. The parties stipulate that the ends of justice are served by the Court excluding such time, so that counsel for the defendant may have reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv) and Local Code T-4. Specifically, all defense counsel need additional time to review the discovery already provided and to conduct further investigation of the case. Defense counsel for Mr. Cruz was recently appointed and Mr. Contreras also has new defense counsel, both of whom need additional time to review the discovery and perform investigation. The parties stipulate and agree that the interests of justice served by granting this continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A).

Respectfully Submitted,

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

HEIKO P. COPPOLA

Assistant U.S. Attorney

MICHAEL LONG

Attorney for Defendant Jose Pena

JESSE SANTANA

Attorney for Defendant

Leonardo Contreras

BENJAMIN GALLOWAY

Attorney for Defendant Victor Cruz

ERIN RADEKIN

Attorney for Defendant Damian Cervantes

CARL LARSON

Attorney for Defendant Oscar Virrueta

SO ORDERED.

HON. JOHN A. MENDEZ

U.S. District Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Pena

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 22, 2011
CASE NO. 2:10-CR-0468 JAM (E.D. Cal. Sep. 22, 2011)
Case details for

United States v. Pena

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JOSE PENA, et.al. Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Sep 22, 2011

Citations

CASE NO. 2:10-CR-0468 JAM (E.D. Cal. Sep. 22, 2011)