United States v. Pedregon

2 Citing cases

  1. United States v. Pedregon

    Case No. 09-CR-00586-LHK-1 (N.D. Cal. Aug. 24, 2017)

    In the instant case, Defendant "challenge[d] the sufficiency of the evidence" on appeal. United States v. Pedregon, 520 F. App'x 605, 608 (9th Cir. 2013). The Ninth Circuit addressed this claim.

  2. In re Carrier IQ, Inc. Consumer Privacy Litigation

    78 F. Supp. 3d 1051 (N.D. Cal. 2015)   Cited 121 times
    Holding that plaintiffs stated implied warranty claim based on a mobile device defect that "actively intercepts and/or transmits personal communication data to third parties"

    Hence, the language quoted above was not a holding of the court. See, e.g.,United States v. Pedregon, 520 Fed.Appx. 605, 608 (9th Cir.2013) (“We are not bound by dicta—discussions that are ‘unnecessary to the Court's holdings,’—in decisions from our court or any other court.” (quotation omitted)). At least one decision in this District has applied both Councilman and Konop, implicitly finding no conflict between the decisions.